Journal des débats 2006-nov-14 | Assemblée législative de l'Ontario

Mrs. Julia Munro (York North): Today is the all-party arts day at Queen's Park. We recognize the contributions that arts and culture make to our society and welcome members of the arts community and the Ontario Arts Council.

Today is also a day we mark the government's broken promise to Ontario's arts community. The McGuinty Liberal government made a solemn promise to Ontario artists in their 2003 election platform. It said, "Within the first two years of our mandate, [the minister's advisory council for arts and culture] will produce a report on the status of the artist in Ontario in the 21st century. This report will be used to develop status of the artist legislation for our artists in Ontario...." More than three years later, neither this House nor Ontario's arts community has seen either a report or legislation. This is a broken promise by the government.

I have to ask, when will they release a report? When will they introduce legislation? Why is simply writing a report within two years such a hard promise for the Liberals to keep? Maybe the government doesn't want an act, and, by waiting so long, there will not be any time to pass one before the next election. Ontario's arts communities want answers, and if they don't get them, they will remember next October.

Applause.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): This would be a good time to remind our guests that only members can participate in the activities of the Legislature.

CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE
PULMONARY DISEASE

Mr. Shafiq Qaadri (Etobicoke North): It's a privilege today for me to stand in recognition of World Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Day, or World COPD Day. I can tell you that it's a very important realm of illness and I say that, of course, both as a physician as well as an MPP.

COPD includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis. In a kind of rough-and-ready definition, it's sort of like trying to breathe through a straw all day long. Unfortunately, people with COPD have difficulty performing simple tasks like walking upstairs, because they struggle for every breath.

Unfortunately, there's something in the order of 270,000 patients diagnosed with COPD in Ontario today, and probably an equal number who remain undiagnosed. Unfortunately, about 115 individuals are admitted with COPD to hospitals daily. It's ranked as the fifth major cause of hospitalization.

Tomorrow is World COPD Day. In recognition of this, the Ontario Lung Association, along with its federal counterpart, is hosting an event this evening in the legislative dining room from 5 to 7 p.m. I would encourage all MPPs and their staff to attend. At the event, the lung association will be releasing startling information about the impact of COPD generally, and particularly on women, because COPD is now one of the few leading causes of death for which the impact is increasing rapidly.

Thank you for this time. I invite you to join us for autographs with NHL star Dennis Hull.

Mrs. Elizabeth Witmer (Kitchener-Waterloo): I'm also going to speak today about World Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Day, which is tomorrow, November 15. It is a respiratory disease that unfortunately is increasing but to some extent is still quite unknown and unfamiliar to people. It is a disease that causes the airways of our lungs to be inflamed and become obstructed or blocked. It makes it difficult to breathe in the same way that chronic bronchitis and emphysema do. People with COPD have that shortness of breath, and obviously their activities are quite limited. They often will tell you that having COPD is like breathing through a straw every minute of every day. I think you can imagine how difficult that would be for an individual.

There is no cure, but symptoms can be managed. It is a leading cause of death, and a cause of death that unfortunately is on the rise. It's the fourth leading cause of death in our country. Again, I want to say that 50% of Ontarians will tell you that they've never heard of COPD.

Today we have a special event in the dining room. All MPPs and staff are invited to attend. They're going to be sharing some information about the impact of it on women. We will hear that deaths among women are almost as high as deaths from breast cancer. So we do want to make sure that people are aware of this serious disease.

ONTARIO ARTISTS

Ms. Cheri DiNovo (Parkdale-High Park): I tabled a resolution, and this is it:

That, in the opinion of this House, the Minister of Culture proceed forthwith to introduce status-of-the-artist legislation as promised by her in this Legislature on May 15, 2006.

Today we celebrate the arts at Queen's Park, and I ask that we also celebrate the artist -- not only celebrate, but also assist, as our artists are suffering. Ontario lags behind other provinces and other jurisdictions in provisions for artists. We desperately need status-of-the-artist legislation, legislation that was promised in this House on May 15 of this year by our Minister of Culture. We need protection for children in the arts and income averaging for those whose income varies dramatically every year. We need benefits and retraining for artists and we need housing for artists. As the corporatization of our culture continues unchecked, we need opportunities for our artists, and by "artists" I'm speaking of musicians, filmmakers, writers and actors as well as visual artists. To celebrate the arts and not bring in promised legislation -- that is, status-of-the-artist legislation -- for the artist is not to celebrate the arts at all. Without artists, there are no arts.

1340

QUINTE AMATEUR RADIO CLUB

Mr. Ernie Parsons (Prince Edward-Hastings): There are about a hundred thousand reasons why I'm proud to represent the riding of Prince Edward-Hastings, that number reflecting the number of individuals who live in my area.

I would like today to recognize a group of my constituents who since 1947 have very quietly contributed to our community. They're the members of the Quinte Amateur Radio Club. This club was formed by a group of engineers from Northern Electric, now Nortel. While obviously the club was formed to enable hams to communicate with each other, they have considerably extended the services they provide to our community. The Quinte Amateur Radio Club has regularly become involved in such events as the Super Cities Walk for MS, the Cheerios Mother Daughter Walk for Heart and Stroke, the Belleville Community Policing Halloween Safe Streets project and the Prince Edward County Marathon. They performed yeoman service during the ice storm a few years ago.

I'm particularly excited by the most recent project, which is supporting one of our schools, Centre Hastings Secondary School, to have direct radio contact with astronauts on the International Space Station, scheduled to happen on Monday, November 20. This will be only the 14th radio contact by a school with ISS in Canada and the fifth in Ontario. I am especially proud that this will be the only contact for this space station crew with any school in North America. This fantastic experience for the students is possible only because of this radio club and the wonderful work done by the teachers in our school system.

I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the Quinte Amateur Radio Club on their 60th anniversary and to thank them for the tremendous contribution to our community and province.

COMMUNITY SAFETY

Mr. Garfield Dunlop (Simcoe North): Today I'd like to welcome the Police Association of Ontario here on their annual lobby day. I know president Bob Baltin and CAO Bruce Miller are here, and they represent 30,000 uniformed officers here in Ontario. I think there are a lot of things we can do in this House to improve community safety and to make improvements for not only the folks here in Ontario but for people right across the country.

One of those things is to get the legislation that the Harper government has brought forward and stop the obstruction by the opposition. One thing the Liberal Party here in this House can do is to ask their cousins in Ottawa to stop the obstruction we're seeing on some very valuable legislation. Since the beginning of the Parliament in Ottawa, only three of 11 crime bills have actually been passed, because they have been obstructed by the federal cousins of these folks here, right across the floor. For example, C-10, mandatory minimum sentences for serious drug and firearms crimes, has been halted right now, as we speak. Bill C-21, which amends the Firearms Act, has been delayed as well. The age of protection -- protecting children from sexual predators by raising the age from 14 to 16 years of age -- has also been delayed by their federal cousins in Ottawa. If there's anything this government can do to help people in this country and in Ontario today, they can get their federal cousins to stop the obstruction and get this legislation passed to help all Canadians and Ontarians.

LANGUAGE TRAINING /
FORMATION LINGUISTIQUE

Mr. Phil McNeely (Ottawa-Orléans): I rise today to recognize English-as-a-Second-Language Week and French-as-a-Second-Language Week in Ontario. I commend the dedicated instructors of ESL and FSL for the important work they do in assisting newcomers to settle in this province.

Notre gouvernement reconnaît que les nouveaux arrivants auront plus de succès lorsqu'ils développent une compétence soit dans la langue anglaise ou dans la langue française -- les langues parlées dans le monde du travail.

That's why we are working to transform adult, non-credit language training in Ontario so that it better fits the needs of our newcomers. Last year, more than 140,000 newcomers arrived in Ontario to begin new lives. They are better educated and more skilled than ever before. They are skilled in fields ranging from medicine to architecture. The sooner they are able to put their talents to work for Ontario and the global marketplace, the better off they are, and the better off we are as a province.

The McGuinty government recognizes the challenge and the importance of helping newcomers get the language training they need so they can thrive in the workplace and life here in Ontario. Ontario invests more than $130 million annually on language training and settlement services, more than any other province. Our success in helping newcomers obtain the English and French language skills they need has been, and will continue to be, built through partnership with organizations like TESL Ontario and almost 4,000 instructors who work with the newcomers.

Notre gouvernement va continuer à travailler avec nos associés pour fournir des soutiens qui vont contribuer au succès de nos nouveaux arrivés.

SYLVIA SUTHERLAND

Mr. Jeff Leal (Peterborough): I rise today to pay tribute to Mayor Sylvia Sutherland. I had the distinct pleasure of serving with Her Worship for 12 of my 18 years as a member of Peterborough city council. During those years, she faced many challenges and made many tough decisions that weren't always popular, but always had the residents of Peterborough's best interests at heart. She was tough when she had to be and accomplished much while in office.

In the days following the flood of July 15, 2004, she demonstrated courage and leadership as she spearheaded the recovery effort. Sylvia was a mayor with vision and understanding of the need to create an economic plan that would benefit Peterborough today and in the future.

I recently had the opportunity to attend an event in her honour, and I can tell you, Mr. Speaker, there wasn't a seat or a parking lot spot to be found. She leaves behind a legacy of accomplishments that any one of us here today, sitting in this House, would be proud of. The residents of Peterborough owe her a great debt of gratitude.

I'd like to conclude by saying congratulations to Mayor Sylvia Sutherland, the longest-serving mayor in Peterborough's history, on a job well done. May you have a long and happy retirement.

BRUCE DUNCAN

Ms. Jennifer F. Mossop (Stoney Creek): I rise today to advise the House of the passing of one of Ontario's most devoted environmentalists. Bruce Duncan died in an automobile accident last Saturday.

Mr. Duncan was the very able chief executive officer of the Hamilton Conservation Authority. Previously, he had been with the Grand River Conservation Authority for 15 years. He was one-time president of the Hamilton Naturalists' Club, and in 1991 founded the Niagara Peninsula Hawkwatch program.

In his early years with the Hamilton Conservation Authority, Mr. Duncan instilled in thousands of children an appreciation for nature. He reached a wider audience as a frequent guest on radio and television in Hamilton, and I remember his very gentle and very effective manner.

Mr. Duncan was respected in the environmental community for his passion for conservation, but, equally, he was respected in development circles for his realistic advice on development issues near watersheds.

I had the pleasure of working with Mr. Duncan very recently, as the government made a special gift to the conservation authority. Just two weeks ago, Minister Caplan and I were able to hand over the deed to 180 acres of the Eramosa Karst lands in upper Stoney Creek to the authority. It was something Bruce worked very hard on, and he and the authority had some wonderful plans for those rare heritage lands, which will soon be open to the public as part of a trail system. It will indeed be part of a very rich legacy of environmentalism and advocacy for nature left by Bruce Duncan.

Mr. Duncan's passion for the outdoors was exceeded only by his love for his family, and I ask members to join with me in extending our deepest condolences to Mr. Duncan's wife, Janet, and his children, James and Katie. Bruce Duncan was 60 years old.

VISITORS

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): We have with us today in the Speaker's gallery 10 recent university graduates who are interning at the House of Commons under the auspices of the Canadian parliamentary internship program. They are participating in a comparative study tour of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Please join me in welcoming our guests.

REPORTS BY COMMITTEES

STANDING COMMITTEE
ON THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY

Mr. Bob Delaney (Mississauga West): I beg leave to present a report from the standing committee on the Legislative Assembly and move its adoption.

The Clerk-at-the-Table (Ms. Lisa Freedman): Your committee begs to report the following bill as amended:

Bill 52, An Act to amend the Education Act respecting pupil learning to the age of 18 and equivalent learning and to make complementary amendments to the Highway Traffic Act / Projet de loi 52, Loi modifiant la Loi sur l'éducation concernant l'apprentissage des élèves jusqu'à l'âge de 18 ans et l'apprentissage équivalent et apportant des modifications complémentaires au Code de la route, the title of which is amended to read, "An Act to amend the Education Act respecting pupil learning to the age of 18 and equivalent learning / Loi modifiant la Loi sur l'éducation concernant l'apprentissage des élèves jusqu'à l'âge de 18 ans et l'apprentissage équivalent."

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Shall the report be received and adopted?

All in favour will say "aye."

All opposed will say "nay."

In my opinion, the ayes have it.

Call in the members. This will be a five-minute bell.

The division bells rang from 1349 to 1354.

The Speaker: Mr. Delaney has presented the report of the standing committee on the Legislative Assembly with respect to Bill 52. All those in favour of having the report received and adopted will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the Clerk.

Ayes

Balkissoon, Bas

Bartolucci, Rick

Bentley, Christopher

Bradley, James J.

Broten, Laurel C.

Brownell, Jim

Bryant, Michael

Caplan, David

Chambers, Mary Anne V.

Colle, Mike

Crozier, Bruce

Delaney, Bob

Dhillon, Vic

Di Cocco, Caroline

Duguid, Brad

Duncan, Dwight

Flynn, Kevin Daniel

Hoy, Pat

Jeffrey, Linda

Kular, Kuldip

Kwinter, Monte

Leal, Jeff

Levac, Dave

Matthews, Deborah

McNeely, Phil

Milloy, John

Mitchell, Carol

Mossop, Jennifer F.

Parsons, Ernie

Peters, Steve

Phillips, Gerry

Qaadri, Shafiq

Racco, Mario G.

Ruprecht, Tony

Sandals, Liz

Sergio, Mario

Smith, Monique

Smitherman, George

Van Bommel, Maria

Watson, Jim

Wynne, Kathleen O.

Zimmer, David

The Speaker: All those opposed will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the Clerk.

Nays

Arnott, Ted

Barrett, Toby

Bisson, Gilles

Chudleigh, Ted

DiNovo, Cheri

Dunlop, Garfield

Elliott, Christine

Hardeman, Ernie

Horwath, Andrea

Hudak, Tim

Klees, Frank

Kormos, Peter

MacLeod, Lisa

Marchese, Rosario

Miller, Norm

O'Toole, John

Ouellette, Jerry J.

Prue, Michael

Runciman, Robert W.

Tabuns, Peter

Tascona, Joseph N.

Tory, John

Witmer, Elizabeth

Yakabuski, John

The Deputy Clerk (Ms. Deborah Deller): The ayes are 42; the nays are 24.

The Speaker: The bill is therefore ordered for third reading.

VISITORS

Ms. Cheri DiNovo (Parkdale-High Park): On a point of order, Mr. Speaker: I just wanted to introduce some guests that we have here today whom we should be proud to have in our midst. We have the Writers' Union of Canada. We have the American Federation of Musicians, representatives from the Canadian office; the Brantford Musicians Association, representatives there; ACTRA, many representatives, including Ms. Fiona Reid herself, Order of Canada and Dora winner. Thank you.

STANDING COMMITTEE
ON ESTIMATES

Mr. Tim Hudak (Erie-Lincoln): I beg leave to present a report from the standing committee on estimates.

The Clerk-at-the-Table (Ms. Lisa Freedman): Mr. Hudak from the standing committee on estimates presents the committee's report as follows:

Pursuant to standing order 61(c), the following supplementary estimates (2006-07) are reported back to the House as they were not selected by the committee for consideration:

Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration, vote 606, citizenship and immigration capital, $1,000.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Pursuant to standing order 61(c), the report of the committee is deemed to be received and the supplementary estimates of the ministry named therein as not being selected for consideration by the committee are deemed to be concurred in.

VISITORS

Hon. Kathleen O. Wynne (Minister of Education): I would like to acknowledge some special visitors. The grade 5 students from Mrs. De Lorenzo's and Ms. De Koe's classes at St. Bernard Catholic School are visiting the Legislature today.

Hon. Mike Colle (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration): I would like to introduce the students, parents and staff from John Ross Robertson school in my riding -- some of the best students from the best school in North America.

MOTIONS

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

Hon. James J. Bradley (Minister of Tourism, minister responsible for seniors, Government House Leader): I seek unanimous consent to put forth a motion without notice regarding the membership of the standing committee on regulations and private bills.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Agreed? Agreed.

Hon. Mr. Bradley: I move that Mr. Delaney be added to the standing committee on regulations and private bills.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry? Carried.

COMMITTEE SITTINGS

Hon. James J. Bradley (Minister of Tourism, minister responsible for seniors, Government House Leader): I seek unanimous consent to put forward a motion without notice regarding a committee time change for the standing committee on the Legislative Assembly.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Agreed? Agreed.

Hon. Mr. Bradley: I would like to make a correction on that last one. It's going to say the following, if the two opposition House leaders are listening to this. It should have read: I seek unanimous consent to put forward a motion without notice regarding a committee time change for the standing committee on finance and economic affairs.

The Speaker: Mr. Bradley is really asking for unanimous consent for a time change for the standing committee on finance and economic affairs. Agreed? Agreed.

Hon. Mr. Bradley: I move that in addition to its regularly scheduled meeting times, the standing committee on finance and economic affairs be authorized to meet from January 22, 2007, to January 25, 2007, January 29, 2007, to February 1, 2007, and February 22 and February 23, 2007, for the purpose of pre-budget consultations.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House the motion carry? Carried.

PRIVATE MEMBERS' PUBLIC BUSINESS

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Agreed? Agreed.

Hon. Mr. Bradley: I move that Mr. Ouellette and Mr. Miller exchange places in order of precedence such that Mr. Miller assumes ballot item 60 and Mr. Ouellette assumes ballot item 75, and that, pursuant to standing order 96(g), notice be waived for ballot item 60 and ballot item 62.

The Speaker: Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry? Carried.

HOUSE SITTINGS

Hon. James J. Bradley (Minister of Tourism, minister responsible for seniors, Government House Leader): I move that, pursuant to standing order 9(c)(i), the House shall meet from 6:45 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 14, 2006, for the purpose of considering government business.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Is it the pleasure of the House that the motion carry?

All those in favour will say "aye."

All those opposed will say "nay."

In my opinion, the ayes have it.

Call in the members. This will be a five-minute bell.

The division bells rang from 1404 to 1409.

The Speaker: All those in favour will please stand one at a time and be recognized by the Clerk.

Ayes

Arnott, Ted

Balkissoon, Bas

Barrett, Toby

Bartolucci, Rick

Bentley, Christopher

Bradley, James J.

Broten, Laurel C.

Brownell, Jim

Bryant, Michael

Caplan, David

Chambers, Mary Anne V.

Chudleigh, Ted

Colle, Mike

Crozier, Bruce

Delaney, Bob

Dhillon, Vic

Di Cocco, Caroline

Duguid, Brad

Duncan, Dwight

Elliott, Christine

Flynn, Kevin Daniel

Gravelle, Michael

Hardeman, Ernie

Hoy, Pat

Hudak, Tim

Jeffrey, Linda

Klees, Frank

Kular, Kuldip

Kwinter, Monte

Lalonde, Jean-Marc

Leal, Jeff

Levac, Dave

Matthews, Deborah

Mauro, Bill

McNeely, Phil

Meilleur, Madeleine

Miller, Norm

Milloy, John

Mitchell, Carol

Mossop, Jennifer F.

O'Toole, John

Ouellette, Jerry J.

Parsons, Ernie

Peters, Steve

Phillips, Gerry

Pupatello, Sandra

Qaadri, Shafiq

Racco, Mario G.

Ramal, Khalil

Runciman, Robert W.

Ruprecht, Tony

Sandals, Liz

Scott, Laurie

Sergio, Mario

Smith, Monique

Smitherman, George

Takhar, Harinder S.

Tascona, Joseph N.

Tory, John

Van Bommel, Maria

Watson, Jim

Wilkinson, John

Witmer, Elizabeth

Wynne, Kathleen O.

Yakabuski, John

Zimmer, David

The Speaker: All those opposed will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the Clerk.

Nays

Bisson, Gilles

DiNovo, Cheri

Horwath, Andrea

Kormos, Peter

Marchese, Rosario

Prue, Michael

Tabuns, Peter

The Deputy Clerk (Ms. Deborah Deller): The ayes are 66; the nays are 7.

The Speaker: I declare the motion carried.

STATEMENTS BY THE MINISTRY
AND RESPONSES

DIABETES

Hon. George Smitherman (Deputy Premier, Minister of Health and Long-Term Care): I'm pleased to rise today and mark the occasion of World Diabetes Day. Diabetes is a serious chronic disease that, if not managed properly and with care, can lead to long-term debilitating complications. Some 800,000 people have been diagnosed with diabetes in Ontario alone, and another 200,000 may be unaware that they have diabetes. Of that total of one million Ontarians, more than 300,000 people will develop debilitating complications. That's an awful lot of people potentially facing amputations, blindness, dialysis, cardiac surgery, heart attacks and strokes.

Our government is well aware of the ramifications of diabetes. That is why we currently provide some $53 million in annual funding for diabetes programs and services. They are particularly focused on wellness, health promotion, diabetes education, early intervention and effective prevention of diabetes-related complications. We are doing our best to make diabetes care for everyone more than just a slogan. Health services like these are crucial in meeting our government's priority to keep people of all ages healthier. And it's thanks to health services like these that we are successfully building a patient-centred chronic disease management and prevention system that not only responds to community needs but also brings better management to the delivery of care.

Our government is also providing $18.1 million to enhance existing community diabetes education programs and to create 76 new programs as part of the government's chronic disease management strategy. This new funding represents an increase of more than 51% over last year. As well, the government recently added a new drug, Actos, to the province's list of medicines that will now be covered by the Ontario drug benefit program under Bill 102's new conditional listing mechanism.

Today, on World Diabetes Day, I'm proud to announce that the Ontario government will now cover 100% of the cost of insulin pumps and related supplies for children and youth age 18 and under, retroactive to April 1.

People with diabetes need to monitor their blood sugar levels daily. This takes self-discipline. It's especially challenging for children and youth to manage their own health when they'd rather be playing, spending time with friends or doing countless other activities that could be more fun. We want kids to be kids. That's why we wanted to provide this assistance. Insulin pumps will give more of them the freedom to live and to play. They will have one less thing to worry about.

An insulin pump is a small mechanical device about the size of a pager that is worn outside the body, often on a belt or in a pocket. It pumps insulin into the body through a narrow tube or very fine needle inserted under the skin. The pump is programmed to deliver insulin at a steady rate, based on the individual's needs. A top-up of insulin for meals or high blood sugar readings between meals can be manually programmed into the pump by the user.

We've designated funding of $9.65 million in 2006-07 for the purchase of insulin pumps and ongoing related supplies for youth 18 years and under with type 1 diabetes. With this initiative, the government of Ontario recognizes the special needs of children with type 1 diabetes. Children are our first priority because they are at most risk for developing serious complications of type 1 diabetes, such as kidney disease, obesity, coronary disease and hypertension. Roughly 6,500 children in the province of Ontario have type 1 diabetes, and approximately 600 are currently using insulin pumps. With this new funding initiative, some 1,000 of the 6,500 children who have type 1 diabetes are expected to benefit.

The insulin pump program will be delivered through the 34 regional pediatric programs of the Network of Ontario Pediatric Diabetes Programs. The NOPDP provides pediatric diabetic services to more than 90% of children with diabetes in Ontario. Since its inception in 2001, network programs have served a total of more than 9,000 clients. With this new funding initiative, we have an opportunity to ensure that young people with diabetes receive the care they need to help them lead healthier, happier lives. Ontario is the first province in Canada to fund the purchase of insulin pumps.

I'd like to take this opportunity to acknowledge several groups, including the Canadian Diabetes Association, the Diabetes Hope Foundation and the juvenile diabetes association, who are here with us today on this important occasion. I'd especially like to single out Terry Anne Thomson, the coordinator for the Ontario Diabetes Action Partnership. Terry was key in raising awareness of this issue and engaging the government and other community groups to help lead us to where we are today with this new initiative.

I also want to acknowledge the efforts of my colleague from Thunder Bay-Superior North, Michael Gravelle. A year ago he introduced Bill 15, which had the same goal of increasing access to insulin pumps for individuals with diabetes. I know that all members of the House have been very supportive, and Mr. Gravelle has had a measurable impact in bringing awareness to this issue that the government first addressed last spring in our budget and that is being announced today.

The McGuinty government is expanding its program to help more people with diabetes improve their quality of life. We're strengthening a chronic disease management and prevention system that responds to patient and community needs. Today's initiative is another example of our plan to build a health care system that helps people to stay healthy, delivers good care when they need it and ensures that the health system will be there for their children and grandchildren.

SOUTIENS À L'EMPLOI /
EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS

L'hon. Christopher Bentley (ministre de la Formation et des Collèges et Universités): Investir dans les ressources humaines et leurs compétences est une des pierres angulaires de la stratégie économique du gouvernement McGuinty. Nous ne réaliserons pas notre potentiel en tant que province tant que chaque Ontarienne et Ontarien n'aura pas réalisé son propre potentiel. Aider la population et les entreprises de la province à trouver facilement et rapidement les services de formation et de soutien dont elles ont besoin est crucial si nous voulons réaliser ce potentiel.

We will not reach our potential as a province until every Ontarian reaches their potential. Assisting Ontarians and Ontario businesses to easily and effectively find the training and support services they need is essential if we are to reach that potential. Last week, I announced a new initiative which will help do exactly that. It's called Employment Ontario, Ontario's employment and training network.

1420

The McGuinty government has been investing substantially in skills and employment support services. In fact, this year, we'll spend approximately $340 million on employment support services, including an increase of $42 million over the past two years. This is in addition to the substantial post-secondary investments we have been making.

Our investments include $100 million this year in Employment Ontario's apprenticeship programs, including an expansion of the Ontario youth apprenticeship program, the pre-apprenticeship training program and the college co-op diploma apprenticeship program to help facilitate the route to an apprenticeship. This is in addition to the apprenticeship training tax credit and the apprenticeship scholarship and employer signing bonus, which both encourage employers to hire apprentices. These initiatives have helped keep us on track to meeting our goal of 26,000 new annual registrants to apprenticeship by 2007-08.

Literacy and academic upgrading are essential if we're to reach our economic potential. These programs give thousands of Ontarians a fresh opportunity to reach their potential. Studies consistently show that investing in literacy has a positive economic impact.

Employment Ontario's Job Connect services provide over 80 communities in Ontario with access to job information, employment workshops and one-on-one employment services. Our $127-million investment in Job Connect includes a $10-million increase to provide services to both youth and adults, as well as support for the opening of three new Job Connect centres with specialized services for newcomers. In fact, Ontario now has a substantial network of programs to help provide our province with the skilled workforce we need to make our economy strong.

About 470 different service providers in almost 900 locations will serve over half a million Ontarians with employment and training needs this year, including 76,000 employers. But this itself is a challenge.

What we haven't had in Ontario is a way to coordinate our services to make sure they are properly linked together. With so many providers of service in so many locations, where do you start? Are they properly coordinated? Does one lead effectively to another?

Employment Ontario is the place to start when you don't know where to start. It will help Ontarians make better use of the employment and training services we have by providing a single point of access to our newly coordinated network. Behind that, the services will be coordinated so that if you access a service which is not what you need, you will be referred to the one that you do need.

The existing services you are used to accessing and which perform such important work will continue. Employment Ontario will support them by providing a very important window onto those services, which should make them even more effective. We are building on the strengths of what's working.

Last week, I had the privilege of visiting two Job Connect centres, ACCES in Toronto and JVS in Markham, to launch Employment Ontario. This new initiative includes: a toll-free number, 1-800-387-5656, with expanding capabilities to help Ontarians get detailed information on the services they need in their local communities; a new website with updated training and employment information and access to a database of our employment and training service providers in Ontario; new multilingual access to program information in 21 languages in addition to English and French; and a new name -- Employment Ontario, Ontario's employment and training network -- to give people and businesses a place to start when they don't know where to start.

These are important initiatives, but you should know that we are doing even more to plan for the future. That is why we signed the labour market development agreement and the labour market partnership agreement with the federal government. These two agreements will strengthen and add to our ability to help employers find the skilled workers they need or retrain the ones they have to help meet market opportunities and challenges. They will also help Ontarians find the extra skills and education that will give them the ability to achieve their goals.

Whether you are looking to add to your skills or rebuild them, Employment Ontario will help. Whether you have a job and might be looking for a better one, or are looking, Employment Ontario will help. It will help community groups and agencies refer their clients to the services they need to achieve their goals. It will also provide greater local input to planning, directing resources to where they can best help employers, workers, newcomers and people looking for work. Employment Ontario will also focus on meeting local needs to help all of our different regions participate in economic growth.

Employment Ontario will help Ontarians take advantage of the programs we have and ensure that those programs reach the people who need them. It will help every one of us reach our potential.

POLICE

Hon. Monte Kwinter (Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services): I rise today to pay tribute to the Police Association of Ontario and its members as they join us for their ninth annual legislative day here at Queen's Park. I'd like to acknowledge the presence of Bob Baltin, president of the PAO; chief administrative officer Bruce Miller; vice-president Brenda Lawson of the Ottawa Police Association; and Karl Walsh, the president of the Ontario Provincial Police Association.

As members know, the Police Association of Ontario is the official voice of Ontario's front-line police personnel. More than 30,000 police officers and civilians serving in police services throughout Ontario make up its membership. These are the people who put their lives on the line, day in and day out, to ensure that our province remains safe, secure and prosperous.

We owe an enormous debt of gratitude to the members of the Police Association of Ontario for all they do for our community. They are on the side of families concerned about crime and safety, as is the McGuinty government. Working together, we have accomplished a lot in our fight to make Ontario safer and stronger.

Last November, for example, we introduced the Mandatory Blood Testing Act, 2006. This is an issue of great interest to the Police Association of Ontario, and I'm grateful to them for their input and significant contribution to the content of the bill. If passed, the Mandatory Blood Testing Act, 2006, would help resolve many of the issues that concern our police and other community safety workers and give them the peace of mind to go about their work with greater confidence.

The PAO was also instrumental in helping us develop the Private Security and Investigative Services Act, legislation that was passed by this House last December. The act calls for professional standards, advanced training, and licensing and better regulation of the private security business. We expect the regulations to be in place by the summer of 2007. These will lead to a more professional, modern industry in a very important sector of Ontario.

Another PAO contribution was its input in the development of the Safer Communities-1,000 Officers partnership program. Together, we have worked to make it a success.

The McGuinty government is working on many fronts to make the work of our front-line police officers more effective and efficient and to make our communities safer. The Law Enforcement and Forfeited Property Management Statute Law Amendment Act, 2005, proclaimed on August 1, 2006, will help police and communities combat the threat to community safety posed by illegal marijuana grow operations. The Mandatory Gunshot Wounds Reporting Act, passed by this Legislature last year, will require public hospitals and other prescribed health care facilities to report the names of people who are treated for gunshot wounds to their local police service. The $51-million anti-gun violence initiative announced by Premier Dalton McGuinty in January 2006 is increasing the police services' ability to deal with organized crime. And we earmarked $26 million for a new state-of-the-art operations centre for Toronto's guns and gangs task force.

While these initiatives are aimed at addressing the law enforcement issues faced by front-line police personnel, the McGuinty government has also addressed the PAO's concern with regard to retirement and pensions. We passed legislation that shifted responsibility for the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System from the province to the contributors and beneficiaries themselves. And over the next two years, we're providing $10 million in funding to help cover the start-up costs of supplemental plans for police, fire and paramedic personnel, the start-up costs of the new sponsors corporation and for a facilitator to work with the sponsors corporation.

The McGuinty government is grateful for the hard work, honest feedback and healthy dialogue we have been able to maintain with the PAO. We will continue to do our part to ensure that our partnership with the PAO continues to thrive, and that Ontario is safer and more prosperous as a result.

Today, I am pleased to salute the dedicated and hard-working people who make up the Police Association of Ontario. I thank them for helping us make Ontario a stronger and safer place in which to live, work and play.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Responses?

1430

DIABETES

Mrs. Elizabeth Witmer (Kitchener-Waterloo): I am very pleased to have the opportunity to recognize that today is World Diabetes Day. I'd like to recognize those individuals in the audience who have worked so hard to continue to raise awareness and bring to our attention the need for us to do what we can, obviously, to prevent and reduce the complications of diabetes.

Unfortunately, we know that diabetes is on the rise in almost every country throughout the world. It was in that light, in 1995, that our government actually introduced the diabetes strategy and also introduced the Pediatric Diabetes Initiative and a primary prevention framework for type 2 diabetes. So this announcement today builds on work that has been done in the past.

I know that at the prebudget hearings last year, my colleagues Toby Barrett and Tim Hudak brought forward an amendment that insulin pumps for children should be funded. I know that in the budget of this year there was an announcement of funding for these children. Then we had a reannouncement on October 20 of this year. I hope now, as we hear it for the third time, that the government will move ahead to provide the funding for these children, so that approximately 1,000 of the 6,500 children will be provided with this service.

It's very important that we do what we can today. It has a devastating impact on children and their families. Obviously today's announcement is certainly a step in the right direction. We need to continue to do what we can for those who continue to suffer.

EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS

Mr. Ted Chudleigh (Halton): In response to the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities, I have to wonder when members of this government will stop saying anything to get elected and make Ontario a more competitive place to do business.

This government continues to ignore the real issues faced by businesses and investors in Ontario. Moreover, they continue to ignore the reality of hundreds of thousands of families facing unemployment and loss of jobs in the manufacturing sector. When are they going to put an end to the punitive regulations, high energy prices and unfair property, income and business taxes that hinder jobs and investment in Ontario? It is, after all, this government's policies of broken promises, high costs and saying anything to get elected that most crush business investment in Ontario.

This government would do better to address their frivolous tax-and-spend policies and try to put an end to the stories we hear about the closing of manufacturing plants in Ontario and the demise of manufacturing jobs, the backbone of Ontario's economy.

In the first three years of our government back in 1995 to 1998, 363,400 jobs were created, mostly by the private sector -- about 90% of them by the private sector. That's 110,000 more jobs than the dismal record the Liberals have accomplished, with only 274,000 new jobs in this province. Our government was coming off the worst recession that we'd had in this province in 50 years, whereas this government was coming off a very buoyant economy, which they have managed to wrestle to the ground.

Ontarians are growing very weary of this government's policies of saying anything to get elected.

POLICE

Mr. Garfield Dunlop (Simcoe North): I too would like to welcome the Police Association of Ontario here today, on behalf of John Tory and the PC caucus. I did have an opportunity earlier to do a member's statement on the PAO lobby day, and I wanted to ask some of the members of the government, who have particularly stood in this House time and time again and blamed the federal government, week after week and day after day, about concerns they have with things that are happening in the province of Ontario.

But I can tell you that the Harper government has introduced 11 bills related to crime, and so far they've only had the opportunity to pass three. Why? Because the federal Liberal Party has obstructed at least eight of those bills. If this government can do anything to help the Police Association of Ontario and all police officers in this province, call on your federal cousins to quit obstructing that legislation and get on with passing it so that we can help families and we can make our communities safer here in the province of Ontario. I urge you to do that. Help the Police Association of Ontario to help all citizens of Canada and Ontario make this country better. You can pass that legislation and it will make it better. We finally have a federal government that cares about crime here in Canada.

Mr. Peter Kormos (Niagara Centre): New Democrats join others in welcoming police officers and staff from the Police Association of Ontario to Queen's Park here yet once again, nine years successively. We always look forward to the opportunity to learn from police officers out there on the ground about the difficulties that police officers continue to face here in this province of Ontario.

It's remarkable that the minister can say what he did, citing, among other things, Bill 28. Yet the government sat on it for darned near a year. It was opposition members and opposition caucuses that had to drag the government kicking and screaming to the chamber to debate it.

Interjection.

Mr. Kormos: Over a year, and it still hasn't passed. The Minister of Community Safety stands and speaks about Bill 28 as an indication of this government's commitment to the welfare of police officers. If that's an indication of your commitment to the welfare of police officers, cops in this province are in deep trouble.

You talk about guns and gangs. The fact is that the money that has been invested in the city of Toronto has driven guns and gangs out into smaller-town Ontario, and those police services are starved for the resources that they need to respond to the guns-and-gangs crisis that has been transferred into their municipalities.

Your Law Enforcement and Forfeited Property Management Statute Law Amendment Act proclaimed on August 1, 2006, I tell you, will do nothing to assist police officers in busting grow-ops. Police forces across this province have for the last year been very successful through their own hard work and diligence at busting grow-ops, no thanks to this government.

The fact is that police forces across this province, and municipalities across this province, need hard resources assisting them in the maintenance of adequate levels of policing. Most police services in this province are hard-pressed to even deliver core services, never mind deal with extraordinary demands placed on them.

Do you want to talk about needs? Talk about northern Ontario: communities like Attawapiskat and Peawanuck, the riding of Howard Hampton or of Gilles Bisson, Timmins-James Bay. I've been to some of those NPS services. They don't even know you exist, because you don't know they exist. They're operating police stations with cell doors that won't lock, snowmobiles without tracks, boats without motors. What an embarrassment for this government to talk about its support for police when you've abandoned police forces across the province, and especially in northern Ontario, where police forces have to deal with more and more difficult tasks and you ignore them. You pretend they don't exist. You may not even know they exist.

EMPLOYMENT SUPPORTS

Mr. Rosario Marchese (Trinity-Spadina): I wanted to respond to Mr. Bentley's so-called new initiative. It includes a toll-free number, a new website, new multilingual access to program information and, lo and behold, a new name: Employment Ontario. Hardly Olympic stuff; hardly the stuff of innovation. All we can think of in terms of what the government is doing is that it's just like handing a newcomer or a worker a phone book and saying, "Here, look it up." Hardly Olympic.

But if you looked at what Quebec has done, Minister, you might pick something new and innovative. Quebec did something very innovative 10 years ago. It's An Act Fostering the Development of Manpower Training. It was adopted in 1995. The act reached, in 2005, all employers with a payroll superior to $1 million a year. The goal is to improve manpower qualification through increased investment in manpower training. A concerned employer must spend, in training of its personnel, at least 1% of its payroll each year.

Furthermore, a fund was established, independent from the state, under the name Fonds national de formation de la main-d'oeuvre, sometimes labelled the partners' fund. When an employer doesn't reach the 1% minimum, he must pay the difference to the Ministry of Revenue, and this sum is redirected to the fund. Many institutional developments were initiated by Quebec social partners with the support of this fund.

This is bold; this is new. It's similar to what they did with the status-of-the-artist legislation 10 years ago. Yes, it needs improvement, but they were the first to do that as well and the first to offer $7-a-day child care. That's innovation. I would love to debate stuff like that rather than, once again, another announcement of a government website and hotline that is supposed to solve the complex and challenging problems faced by newcomers and others looking for training and apprenticeship opportunities. That's not innovation, Minister. Sorry.

1440

DAVID MOUNSEY

Hon. James J. Bradley (Minister of Tourism, minister responsible for seniors, Government House Leader): I believe we have unanimous consent for all parties to speak up to five minutes to recognize a fallen police officer.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Mr. Bradley has asked for unanimous consent for all parties to speak up to five minutes in recognizing a fallen police officer. Agreed? Agreed.

Mrs. Carol Mitchell (Huron-Bruce): On October 14, 2006, Constable David Mounsey, a well-known and well-respected member of the Huron county detachment of the Ontario Provincial Police, sustained critical injuries in an on-duty automotive accident. Constable Mounsey, who was also a volunteer firefighter in the community of Blyth, was responding to a call for service at the time of the accident.

I'm saddened to inform the House that on Monday, November 13, after spending nearly a month in a coma, Constable Mounsey succumbed to those injuries and passed away peacefully. David is survived by his partner, Brenda Carey, who is also an active member of the Huron detachment of the OPP. He is also survived by one child, Ryan, as well as two stepchildren, Wyatt and Dalton, and a brother in England, John.

David started his career in law enforcement as a member of the Royal Air Force in Britain before becoming an active constable of the Ontario Provincial Police on April 24, 1998, in the Haldimand-Norfolk OPP detachment. David transferred to the Huron county OPP detachment in 2001, where he served until the time of his passing.

David was also a committee member of the OPP's western region ceremonial unit.

In addition to his duties as a provincial police constable, David was an active volunteer on the Blyth fire department since 2005. David had been a very active member and a tremendous asset to the department since his arrival.

David and his partner, Brenda, have both recently returned from running the 46K Royal Victoria marathon in Victoria, BC. David had undertaken this incredibly physical commitment not for personal gratification, but as a means of raising money for the Blyth fire department to purchase a defibrillator machine for their public service. I would also like the House to know that by collecting from local sponsors and completing the gruelling race, David and his partner were successful in their mission. This is a testament to his amazing commitment not only to the fire department and the police department, but also to the safety of his community.

This is a man who will be truly missed by his colleagues and friends alike. David's professionalism and his bravery will be honoured with a full police funeral to be held in the town of Wingham on Friday, November 17, at 1 p.m. This will be a celebration of David's life and the immense impact that one man can have on his community.

This is yet another example of the risks that are inherent in the jobs of all of our emergency service professionals and how these men and women often make the greatest sacrifice to keep our communities safe. When an officer of the law loses his life while carrying out the duties of his office, it is a loss felt by all of those in our communities. We will honour and remember their devotion to the public good, and we must not take their sacrifices for granted. I would request a moment of silence to show respect for Constable Mounsey and his family for their great loss, and I would request this moment at the end of all tributes.

Mr. Garfield Dunlop (Simcoe North): It is an honour to stand here today and join all members of the House, on behalf of our leader, John Tory, and the PC caucus, as we pay tribute to the life of Ontario Provincial Police Constable David Mounsey.

Constable Mounsey passed away yesterday morning as the result of an on-duty accident that occurred on October 14 of this year. I didn't know Constable Mounsey, but I know he is survived by his spouse, Brenda, and their three children: Ryan, Wyatt and Dalton. He began his career with the Royal Air Force in Britain before joining the OPP. He showed his pride of the OPP as a committed member of the western region ceremonial unit.

The statement "Heroes in life, not death" is the wording that is seen on the police memorial wall here at Queen's Park and on lapel pins that are worn by fellow officers and citizens following the death of an officer. I know a number of the officers here today, on lobby day, have these pins on. They'll continue to wear them up until the funeral, and next year as well on the wall of honour day, on Police Memorial Day here at Queen's Park, the first Sunday in May, when David Mounsey's name will be placed on that wall of honour.

I just wanted to point out a couple of things. I actually met a police officer in a Remembrance Day service on the weekend and he had one of these pins on. I said, "I'm surprised you have that pin on today." He said, "Well, I wear these myself during Remembrance Day services because I feel the remembrance of my colleagues whom I may have known in the past with the Ontario Provincial Police or the police services." During that discussion, I was actually paying a compliment to the police services because I thought what a wonderful job they had done on Remembrance Day services throughout our province, but particularly in my riding where they kept traffic control and patrol to a minimum and kept the noise down so we could pay tribute to our veterans on this very special day.

Now during Remembrance Day services we see many police officers taking part, because they are people who are dedicating their lives as well. It's not war but, I tell you, they're protecting the rights and freedoms that we have here in Ontario. I just want to say, on behalf of our leader, John Tory, thank you to his family and to the community.

I wanted to close with a quote from the newly appointed OPP Commissioner, Julian Fantino. It says, "The men and women of the OPP and the entire policing family are mourning the tragic loss of a fellow officer and a friend. Constable David Mounsey was an excellent, dedicated police officer. We'll miss him very much."

Mr. Howard Hampton (Kenora-Rainy River): Every day, police officers keep our families and communities safe. Every day when they put on their uniforms and say goodbye to their own families, they do so knowing that they may put themselves in harm's way in order to protect all of us. Today, we acknowledge and remember a police officer who has made the ultimate sacrifice.

On Monday, Ontario Provincial Police Constable David Mounsey died in hospital. Constable Mounsey succumbed to injuries he sustained one month ago when his police cruiser skidded off the road on the way to a transport truck rollover.

As we've heard, Constable Mounsey led a distinguished career, first in the Royal Air Force in Britain and then with Ontario Provincial Police detachments in Haldimand-Norfolk and Huron county and with the OPP western region ceremonial unit.

Today, we join with the people we represent from across Ontario in mourning this loss. We thank Constable Mounsey for his dedication, his courage and his good work in keeping our communities safe, and now for his sacrifice. We extend our most sincere condolences to his wife, Brenda, his children and to all family, friends and colleagues.

The Speaker: I would ask members and our guests to rise for a moment of silence in memory of Constable David Mounsey.

The House observed a moment's silence.

1450

ORAL QUESTIONS

MUNICIPAL FINANCES

Mr. John Tory (Leader of the Opposition): My question is for the Premier. Premier, three months ago, to great fanfare, as usual, the government announced the provincial-municipal fiscal and service delivery review. As happens so frequently with this government, nothing has happened since. We haven't heard a peep of any kind whatsoever, and three months have passed: nothing from the Premier, nothing from the minister; no terms of reference; no membership of the review committee. No announcements of any kind, just the standard line: Don't take any responsibility. Blame somebody else. Blame Ottawa. Don't do anything.

When are you going to act? When is this review going to get under way? When are we going to start to find out how people can have input on this as local governments prepare to approach their budget season yet again?

Hon. Dalton McGuinty (Premier, Minister of Research and Innovation): I want to thank the leader of the official opposition for the question. I infer from the question that he is very much in support of our initiative and that he believes we should continue to work with Ontario municipalities and to strike the very distinctive chord that we have struck during the course of our mandate, which is to treat our municipal colleagues as genuine partners and to have a shared sense of responsibility when it comes to meeting the needs of our shared constituents.

I know that the minister will shortly provide my colleague with more answers, but let me tell you something about some of the stuff we have been able to do together.

We have a new memorandum of understanding in place that ensures that the Association of Municipalities of Ontario is consulted on changes that affect municipalities. We have put in place a two-cent gas tax transfer to our municipalities for them to invest in their public transit. Those are real, practical and tangible and demonstrate the good relationship that we have with Ontario municipalities.

Mr. Tory: We support the initiative but don't support the timetable in two respects. The first is that you announced from the beginning it was going to take 18 months to get this work done, and the second, which makes it even worse, is you have now wasted three months of the 18. I hope they're not cumulative, because that would make it 21 months to get on with it. We want this review and we want it to happen fast, because there are urgent problems in the local communities across the province. We think that when you appoint a review like that and let it stretch out 18 months, it looks like you're trying to kill the bad headlines and put it, of course, after the election.

On September 28, 2006, the House passed a resolution moved by the member for Oxford that states that the review is taking too long. The resolution reads, in part, that the review "is needlessly drawn out and that a full review to balance the delivery of services with the ability to pay should be completed much more expeditiously, in order to avoid hitting Ontario taxpayers with unsustainable property tax hikes or significant reductions in service." Will the Premier keep his promise to the municipalities and keep his promise to respect the will of this House and speed up the review process? Get on with it.

Hon. Mr. McGuinty: I know the leader of the official opposition will want to remind himself that the good work we did with the city of Toronto took us about two years. That's for one, albeit significantly large, urban centre. That took us two years. We now want to address all municipalities throughout the province, about eight million other people living in those municipalities: big, small and in between. We think it's important to take the appropriate amount of time to get it right.

I note in passing that when it came to the City of Toronto Act, which we think is a significant piece of legislation that will help strengthen the city of Toronto, the leader of the official opposition voted against that bill. We will continue to move in the appropriate direction, working with our partners to ensure that we ultimately strengthen them and their cause.

Mr. Tory: The City of Toronto Act definitely had some steps forward, but it didn't deal with the fundamental issue we're talking about here, which is actually getting on with some reform to the finances so they will have the resources to fix some of the problems they have. The fact is, you didn't deal with that, notwithstanding you started talking about it years ago.

Municipalities have passed resolutions calling for you to expedite this process; 100 municipalities have written to us indicating that they think you can and should expedite this process and get on with it and take a lot less than the 18 months you're taking to postpone this until after the election. You're ignoring those 100 municipalities in taking this 18-month delay that you can't really explain. Every single one of these communities, and more, agrees that your dithering and delay are making things worse for them, and instead of acting you're sitting on your hands. Will you listen to the scores of municipalities -- 100 and more -- that have written so far, saying you should speed this process up, get on with it and get on with the reform and helping them out? Are you going to do that?

Hon. Mr. McGuinty: A few points in response: First of all, the Conservative Party should recognize that the reason we're getting involved in this is to clean up their mess. That's number one. We're trying to find a way to correct the downloading foisted upon Ontario municipalities.

Secondly, we've been doing much in the interim. In addition to that memorandum of understanding, we have in place this new gas tax to support public transit. In our last budget there was Move Ontario, a $1.2-billion initiative supporting roads, bridges and the like. We have put in place 14,000 new child care spaces. We're uploading public health costs and land ambulance costs and, yes, we are pursuing this review of services together with our municipal partners. Yes, we will continue to take the correct amount of time to get it right. We'll do it in a collaborative way, a co-operative way, something that is relatively unknown to the former government.

JUSTICES OF THE PEACE

Mr. John Tory (Leader of the Opposition): My question is for the Premier again. They just want you to get on with it, that's all, just get on with it and all these other projects that are written down in disappearing ink.

Let's move to another one. It's the same kind of thing. This is another concern to the municipalities: the shortages of justices of the peace. In July 2003 there were 323 justices of the peace in Ontario. Today there are 298, and that includes five you are going to appoint tomorrow. Forty per cent of those will be retiring within 10 years. The result of this shortage is delays in the court system, court backlogs and the loss of municipal revenues.

Today you said you would love to be able to dole out more money to the municipalities. The fact is, they would be really grateful if you'd stop handcuffing them and cutting off the source of revenue they have today. In refusing to deal with this file, you've cost $700,000 to Hamilton, $765,000 to Niagara and $39 million to Ottawa in lost revenue, and then you voted against a PC motion to allow access to the MTO database so people can track down those who haven't paid. Why did you refuse this reasonable request to give the municipalities access to this information?

Hon. Dalton McGuinty (Premier, Minister of Research and Innovation): To the Attorney General.

Hon. Michael Bryant (Attorney General): Why did you block a bill that could have had JPs sitting in those courtrooms a year ago? We had a bill before this Legislature that would have allowed us to put JPs in those courts to assist those traffic courts in a timely fashion, and the only reason we didn't have that done a year ago is because this official opposition decided to obstruct it. So I say to the member, we got the JPs into the courts; we got the bill passed. Why did you try to obstruct that bill?

Mr. Tory: The member for St. Paul's will have plenty of opportunity to ask questions from over here soon enough. The fact is that the minister didn't bring the bill forward for months, he brought forward an omnibus bill dealing with four or five different subjects, and the real facts are 323 JPs in 2003 and 298 today.

It's not just about money not collected. Municipalities are shelling out big bucks for your failure: a $50-million bill for courthouse security and for courthouses that are sitting empty.

A story from the Port Hope Evening Guide said, "When one court was cancelled without sufficient notice, five police officers on overtime showed up to participate. The town ended up paying 20 hours of overtime to officers who were probably in court about two minutes."

You congratulate yourself for bringing 21 JPs out of retirement. This is the same government that voted down an amendment in the very bill you talk about to extend the retirement age to 75, as recommended by the association of JPs. Why didn't you pass that amendment if you were so concerned about getting JPs into the courts?

Hon. Mr. Bryant: The government has appointed 45 new justices of the peace since we took office. When the Conservative government was in power, between 1995 and 1997, do you know how many JPs they appointed? Did they appoint 45? No. Did they appoint 14? No. They appointed zero justices of the peace.

In addition to the JPs who have been appointed and in addition to putting into place the per diem JPs who will deal with ongoing caseload, this government will not take any lectures from that party when it comes to ensuring that we have access to justice in the province of Ontario.

1500

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Final supplementary.

Mr. Tory: Here are the numbers. For all your great claims, here are the numbers: 323 JPs in 2003; 298 today, including five tomorrow. I'm even crediting you with the five you're going to do tomorrow. That doesn't sound like much of an improvement to me.

During the very same Bill 14 committee hearings, Jane Moffatt, the vice-president of the Prosecutors' Association of Ontario, said the central east region had lost a total of 12 JPs since 2004. That's all on your watch, by the way. You've yet to fill half of those vacancies.

The result is, as Brian Rosborough of AMO told the justice committee: "...police officers waiting sometimes for hours to meet with a justice of the peace on warrant issues. This waiting time results in fewer police officers on the street, a diversion of police resources and added costs for municipalities."

My question is this: Why is this government dithering on this file? Why has the number of JPs gone down on your watch, up to and including today? Will the Premier commit to appointing the JPs that are needed in communities across the province to alleviate this crisis? Will you get on with it?

Hon. Mr. Bryant: The government has got on with it, and we could have gotten on with it a lot earlier if that party hadn't blocked Bill 14.

Contrary to what the member said, the president of the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police provided credit to the government for passing Bill 14 as an important step in modernizing the procedures for prosecuting provincial offences through the available technology. In fact, what we've done is update the traffic court system in terms of the evidence, the prosecution, and the justices of the peace who have been appointed. It's the most significant update to the justice of the peace system, I'm told by the Chief Justice, since 1327. We could have gone on with it a lot earlier and we could have got it done in 2005 if that party had not dragged its feet.

So I say again to the member, we've got on with it all right, and we could have got on with it a lot quicker and a lot --

The Speaker: Thank you.

Interjections.

The Speaker: Order.

ELECTRICITY SUPPLY

Mr. Howard Hampton (Kenora-Rainy River): We've heard of the McGuinty government blaming other governments, but reaching back to 1327 is something none of us, I think, can understand.

A year ago in October, the McGuinty government signed a deal with Bruce Power --

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): I need to know who the question is to.

Mr. Hampton: Oh, this is to the Premier.

The Speaker: Thank you.

Mr. Hampton: -- a private nuclear company. At the time, your energy minister boasted, "This agreement will ensure fair prices and the capacity to meet Ontario's future energy needs."

Premier, do you stand by those comments today? Do you still believe your Bruce Power deal is a good deal for Ontario consumers?

Hon. Dalton McGuinty (Premier, Minister of Research and Innovation): To the Minister of Energy.

Hon. Dwight Duncan (Minister of Energy): The Bruce Power deal was signed. In fact, it wasn't me who said that; it was the outside people we brought in to assist us -- CIBC World Markets -- who said, in fact, it was a "fair deal." It was something called a fairness letter, which very clearly outlined that in the view of the outside body that was advising the government at the time, this would be a good deal.

Just to be certain, I then asked the Provincial Auditor to review the deal, something we felt was appropriate, and sent the deal over to the auditor. The auditor is continuing his review of the deal, and I look forward to his input and advice on that deal. Suffice it to say, the power at Bruce represents an opportunity for us to keep the lights on in Ontario, something we think is very, very important.

The Speaker: Supplementary.

Mr. Hampton: This is the McGuinty government's confidential document dealing with the electricity transmission problem. This is the document the McGuinty government tried to hide from the people of Ontario for the last year, and now we know why you were trying to hide it: because it explains that you don't have the transmission capacity to carry the additional electricity that Bruce Power is supposed to produce starting in 2009. Then it says that if the transmission capacity isn't there by 2009, you'll have to pay Bruce nuclear penalty fees of $460 million a year, while hydro consumers get no additional electricity.

My question to the Premier is, how is paying half a billion dollars for no electricity a good deal for Ontario's hydro consumers?

Hon. Mr. Duncan: I think the power authority released a document last week that said there are a number of solutions that will have the adequate transmission to get the power out of Bruce by 2009. The power authority, an independent body, feels that's adequate; we feel it's adequate. We feel the deal is fair, we feel it's the appropriate deal, and it is the proper way to proceed.

As I say, I rely on the Ontario Power Authority in that regard, and they're very clear in their document today that there are a number of ways, and I look forward to the member's support then, because that transmission is important for wind power as well. So I know he'll work hard with us to make sure that transmission is on stream by 2009 in order to free up the wind resources that are very present in Bruce county.

Mr. Hampton: We'll deal with the Ontario Power Authority document in a few minutes, but this is the government's own document. It paints a very telling picture. The government put together this sweetheart deal with Bruce nuclear, a rush deal, and on page 5 it explains that Ontario should build a reliable transmission line to carry the additional power, but since that new transmission line won't be ready by 2009, it points out that you're going to duct tape the existing system, at an additional cost of $260 million. So half a billion dollars for electricity that people won't be able to use, and then a further $260 million for a Red Green duct tape job.

I ask the Premier this: How is that a good deal for Ontario's electricity consumers?

Hon. Mr. Duncan: Again, the amount of money and the temporary changes will remain in place. It's not like they'll be shut down when the permanent line is brought on. That additional capacity is needed to help bring wind power out of the Bruce county area, which is in addition to the nuclear power that's coming out. It's an important investment, in our view, one that we think will pay dividends to the people of Ontario, the province of Ontario. Again, the power authority has indicated, and we support the view of the power authority, that in fact there will be adequate transmission to get the power out of Bruce county -- not just the nuclear power but, just as importantly, the wind power. I know the leader of the third party will work with us as we bring those new wind opportunities online, as we need that new transmission. I take this as an indication of his support, that he'll support the government as it moves forward with new transmission capacity out of Bruce county.

Mr. Hampton: To the Premier: I don't think anyone is going to support a deal where Ontario Hydro consumers could end up paying $800 million and get no additional electricity. This is the Ontario Power Authority report that was just released. When you read this report, it makes it very clear that a permanent transmission line is needed to get the electricity out of the Bruce Peninsula to the greater Toronto area, but it also makes it clear that that new transmission line will be delayed until 2011 or 2012, possibly -- not ready in 2009. It makes it clear that your duct tape interim solution is acceptable only as a short-term stopgap measure.

I say to the Premier, you signed this sweetheart deal with Bruce Power. It could well end up costing $800 million more for consumers and get no power. Do you still agree this is a good deal for consumers?

Hon. Mr. McGuinty: To the Minister of Energy.

Hon. Mr. Duncan: Let's be clear; let me just re-emphasize: Yes, you're repeating what the Ontario Power Authority, the ISO and Hydro One said last week, that in fact, to get the permanent line, it will be 2011. If you read earlier in that document, you'll see that they recommended a number of relatively easy changes to the existing transmission infrastructure that will allow power not only from nuclear but from wind power in Bruce county -- and, by the way, to our friends in rural Ontario, from anaerobic digest; there's a number of farm opportunities in the area to get that power out of there.

1510

That figure of $800 million you're quoting is just hooey. You're twisting the numbers, you're taking them out of context and you're adding things up that shouldn't be added up. I would suggest you read the documents and the comments of the experts. I don't pretend to be an expert, but I know this: We have the ability to get the power out by 2011 and we have an interim solution at 2009. That investment in the interim solution will continue to pay dividends beyond 2011. Therefore, unlike --

The Speaker: Thank you, Minister. Supplementary.

Mr. Hampton: Here's the reality: Nuclear power options have a long history in Ontario of massive cost overruns, but this one will be a first. The hard-working women and men of Ontario are out $260 million for duct tape aid to the transmission system, but even if the duct tape system is there, it still may not be able to carry the electricity, in which case they pay another $460 million and get no electricity. This is bizarre, in anybody's estimation, and no amount of trying to hide it from the public is going to work.

I say to the Premier again, do you think this is a good deal for the electricity consumers of Ontario, when they could be on the hook for close to $800 million in costs and get no additional hydroelectricity?

Hon. Mr. Duncan: Again, I will stress that in the opinion of CIBC World Markets, which we engaged for an independent review, it is a fair deal. There are risks, and we acknowledge that; there are risks in any of these projects. I look forward to the Leader of the Opposition working with us as we bring on new transmission at various parts of the province to access wind, hydroelectric opportunities. I hope he won't be opposing those kinds of opportunities, because they are important. I acknowledge there's risk in this. That's why we sent the deal to the Provincial Auditor, and I look forward to his comments on the deal. But the greater risk is if we do what his government did and don't address the fundamental challenges before this province. We were facing blackouts, pure and simple. This deal is a risky deal by any standard, and it will be. But it's a fair deal, it's one that will have the power to markets on time and at the cost outlined, and we believe it is the appropriate course of action to pursue in all the circumstances.

Mr. Hampton: The Minister of Energy says that this is a risky deal but a good deal. This is like a general manager of a hockey team putting out lots of money for a washed-up player, and then when he realizes he's washed up, he goes out and pays even more for a temporary player and says to the public, "This is a good deal." There's $460 million at risk right off the top and then a further $240 million at least at risk, and the people of Ontario potentially stand to get no additional electricity. I say to the Premier, how do you justify these kinds of sweetheart deals with your private electricity friends when the hydro ratepayers of Ontario could end up paying a bundle?

Hon. Mr. Duncan: Again, I say to the leader of the third party, first of all, that his numbers are not in touch with reality. They're just taken out of context and mixed together. There will be adequate transmission capacity to get the power out of Bruce once the refurbished reactors are online. It's an appropriate deal. Again, we asked CIBC World Markets for an independent fairness letter, and they provided that. In addition, I've asked the Provincial Auditor for his view on the deal. It's important that we move forward with this development. It's important that the transmission come online by 2011. By 2009, according to the Ontario Power Authority, the Independent Electricity System Operator and Hydro One, we will have adequate transmission resources to get the power from Bruce. It will continue to serve Ontario and make sure we keep the lights on throughout the province.

OTTAWA LIGHT RAIL PROJECT

Ms. Lisa MacLeod (Nepean-Carleton): My question is for the Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal. This weekend my constituents in Nepean-Carleton and throughout all of Ottawa were scared. They were contemplating the fact that you are going to take away $200 million for a rapid transit expansion. On Friday afternoon, three days before the municipal election, this Liberal government issued a letter to city officials regarding the proposed north-south light rail project. Former Mayor Chiarelli claimed this letter meant the province would veto any light rail plan but his and that the $200 million committed by the province was in jeopardy. Ottawa's recent municipal election was a referendum on the former mayor's light rail project, and Larry O'Brien, who is not firmly committed to the proposed light rail project, became the new mayor of Ottawa.

My question: Will the minister clarify the former mayor's comments and will the Ottawa council have the same flexibility it did in 2004 when there was a three-level Liberal McGuinty-Martin-Chiarelli --

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Thank you. The question has been asked.

Hon. David Caplan (Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal, Deputy Government House Leader): I think the member has a future in comedy. This government has signed in good faith, but it has been her mentor, Treasury Board President John Baird, who has thrown a monkey wrench into it.

I want to read from Susan Sherring -- you must know Susan from Ottawa: "So it seems Progressive Conservative leader John Tory is `disappointed' ... `threatening' to withdraw transit funding if Bob Chiarelli isn't elected.

"Well, I'm disappointed Tory can't read," says Susan Sherring. "For the life of me, I can't understand why some believe it's okay for Treasury Board President John Baird to go back on his word, and withhold federal funding, and yet Tory is up in arms because the province says it will honour its commitment.

"Near as we can tell, Tory is upset because the provincial Liberals are keeping their word."

Shame on John Tory, and shame on you for bringing this farce to this House.

Ms. MacLeod: Mr. Speaker --

Interjections.

The Speaker: Order. Minister of Finance, I'm not going to warn you again.

Ms. MacLeod: I too wish life was like a box of chocolates, but the minister can't Gump this up. That $200 million is important to the people of Ottawa, and I'll tell you one thing: At least John Baird did the honourable thing and he has let the new Ottawa council keep the $200 million that the federal government committed. Right now, CFRA is reporting 12 of the 23 councillors will vote against the light rail project as it is today. According to his website, the new mayor is committed to negotiating with Siemens and PLC to implement a six-month delay to allow the city to provide --

Interjections.

Ms. MacLeod: Mr. Speaker, I can't hear over them.

The Speaker: Minister of Economic Development, I'm not going to warn you again either.

Ms. MacLeod: I'm going to make it simple for the minister: The mayor wants to provide realistic alternatives to what he calls "the clear failings and deficits in the current plan." But this Liberal government, in its letter of November 10, told Ottawa voters that any contemplation of other potential alternative investments would be inconsistent.

The so-called referendum on light rail was won by over 45% by Larry O'Brien yesterday, who ran on alternatives to the rapid transit plan, a plan that this government's own letter states would be inconsistent. Will the minister commit to keeping his government's promise in 2004 of $200 million for infrastructure funding in Ottawa, yes or no?

1520

Hon. Mr. Caplan: My, oh my, Speaker. On April 21, 2005, I had the great privilege of signing a memorandum of understanding with the city of Ottawa and the federal government. Unfortunately, it is the federal President of the Treasury Board, John Baird, who has mused aloud and seemingly thrown a monkey wrench into this. The province, of course, has been very clear. We have clarified with the city of Ottawa that we believe in and stand behind our agreement of April 21, 2005.

Now, this member could help. This member could write to John Baird. This member could talk to her colleagues, her kissing cousins in Ottawa, and get them to honour their agreements, which they seem to have a lot of trouble doing -- certainly the Canada-Ontario agreement that my colleague the finance minister talked about in this House, which it looks like Prime Minister Harper and Treasury Board President John Baird are reneging on. This member could help and make sure that --

The Speaker: Thank you. New question.

HOMELESSNESS

Mr. Michael Prue (Beaches-East York): My question is to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Today, in the little Church of the Holy Trinity, just behind the Eaton Centre, we were all reminded of the tragedy of homelessness, because this afternoon they posted the 500th name added to the Toronto homeless memorial. Sadly, the numbers have actually gone up in the past three years. These deaths are preventable; you know they are preventable. Toronto's homeless must be provided with the housing that they need.

Mr. Minister, I have a very simple question: What is your plan to immediately house these homeless so that they do not die at the rate of one per week on our streets?

Hon. John Gerretsen (Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing): I thank the member for the question. As the member well knows, as he's heard in this House on numerous occasions, this government signed an agreement with the federal government a year ago last April to put up $602 million worth of affordable housing in this city and in this province. We're working at it. We've got a housing allowance program that helps people of low income with their housing needs. We've got an affordable housing program, where people are moving into affordable housing units across this province. Some 128 projects have been approved, and have either been built or are in the planning process. We have a rent bank program that has helped over 5,000 individuals in an emergency situation in this province who need help. They've been given the money so that they can stay in their own home. There's a lot of work to be done, but --

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Supplementary.

Mr. Prue: Mr. Minister, your government is quick to make these announcements and re-announcements, but not very quick to actually build the homes; 1,653 are actually occupied, by your own figures. This amounts to only a tiny fraction of the 20,000 units plus the 6,000 units of supportive housing that you promised in the last election. Your government has $400 million set aside in an account that you are not spending on the housing that is so desperately needed. We want you to build that truly affordable housing, and we want it built now.

My question again to you: When will you keep your promise to build the 20,000 units of affordable housing and the 6,000 units of supportive housing and keep our people from dying on the streets?

Hon. Mr. Gerretsen: Once again, for years and years prior to our government taking over in October 2003, absolutely nothing happened, both federally and provincially, as far as affordable housing is concerned. We've made a good start. Is there more work to be done? Absolutely. In addition to the programs I talked about earlier, we've got an additional 3,500 units where people are getting rent supplements now that weren't available to them in October 2003. That means people are getting subsidized rents so that vulnerable individuals with limited means can have a roof over their head. We realize a lot of work has to be done.

As far as the money in the trust fund is concerned, that money is there, we're looking at various program options, and they will be announced as soon as we're in a position to do so.

ALIMENTATION EN ÉLECTRICITÉ /
ELECTRICITY SUPPLY

M. Phil McNeely (Ottawa-Orléans): La question supplémentaire va être posée par le député de Stormont-Dundas-Charlottenburgh.

Ma question s'adresse au ministre de l'Énergie. Plus tôt aujourd'hui, vous avez annoncé la signature d'un accord entre Hydro One et Hydro-Québec qui permettra à l'Ontario d'avoir accès à jusqu'à 1250 mégawatts d'électricité propre et renouvelable.

Renewable power is something that my constituents strongly support. They are constantly telling me that they'd like to see the government invest more in hydro and wind and solar. Today's announcement is a perfect example of how we are listening to them. This is in stark contrast to the previous governments, who either did nothing to bring new renewable sources online, like the Conservatives, or governments who cancelled important renewable projects, like the NDP.

Minister, when can Ontarians expect to start benefiting from this announcement? What does this mean for Ontario's energy system and its economy?

Hon. Dwight Duncan (Minister of Energy): I'd like to thank the member and all his colleagues from the Ottawa region who helped so much in making this a reality. We're very grateful.

This morning we announced the signing of a deal that will create another interconnection between Ontario and Quebec and increase our import and export capacity with Quebec by almost 100% over the next three years. That will allow us to import clean, renewable hydroelectric power from Quebec, and by extension we will be able to export power to Quebec on an as-needed basis.

This is an important development for Ontario. It lessens our dependence on foreign power, gives us more capacity, creates jobs in the Ottawa region and helps us to clean up the environment. We think it's important. It's a win-win-win: a cleaner environment, it's good for Quebec, it's good for Ontario and, most importantly, it's good for Canada.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Supplementary, the member for Stormont-Dundas-Charlottenburgh.

Mr. Jim Brownell (Stormont-Dundas-Charlottenburgh): Minister, renewable power isn't the only energy-related issue my constituents bring up. They also bring up energy conservation, because they know, like I do, that it's cheaper to save a megawatt than to build a megawatt.

I often hear the member from Kenora-Rainy River talk about conservation and criticize our government's action on the file, although I find it quite rich that he does so after his party voted against the Energy Conservation Responsibility Act. Minister, could you clarify for the House and for my constituents what Ontario is doing to reduce energy consumption?

Hon. Mr. Duncan: The Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance gave this government a B+ -- that's up from a D average under the previous government -- and they expect we'll be the leader in Canada by this time next year. That's because we are committed to conservation. More than 500 programs are going on across the province now. Just some examples of how we're saving: 57,000 megawatt hours in home conservation projects; Toronto Hydro's summer challenge, 50,000 megawatt hours, a project that we have just expanded province-wide; London Hydro's fridge retirement program, 12,000 megawatt hours; and the list goes on and on.

We are on target to meet our government's own internal conservation target of 10%, and we are on target, according to the conservation bureau, to meet the 5% peak demand reduction by 2007 that we set out. This government is committed to a cleaner environment. It's the first government in Ontario's history that's actually done something --

The Speaker: Thank you.

HOSPITAL SERVICES

Mr. John Tory (Leader of the Opposition): I have a question for the Minister of Health. We've had brought to our attention today the case of Ms. Crystal Caligiuri. She's in the Markham Stouffville Hospital emergency room, where she has been since Sunday night. She's on a stretcher there. She has been on a stretcher since she's been there. She's suffering from multiple myeloma, which has spread to her liver. Her liver has shut down; her stomach has apparently shut down; her belly is distended by a foot. There is no bed for her. She can't go on chemotherapy, so they have her on a morphine drip. She has been on that drip on a stretcher in the emergency room in the Markham Stouffville Hospital for more than 24 hours now. She's not eating or drinking. She's literally lying there dying on a stretcher.

I wonder how this can be, in the province of Ontario, and I wonder, after you came here with the kinds of announcements and pronouncements and advertisements that you've had, how you can explain this and what you have to say to Ms. Caligiuri and to her family.

Hon. George Smitherman (Deputy Premier, Minister of Health and Long-Term Care): Firstly, what I would say to any family member in the province of Ontario is that the circumstances with respect to our health care system are a shared challenge.

The honourable member doesn't like the cut and thrust of partisan debate in here, and he asked me a torqued question like that. How could it come to this? Your party cut acute --

1530

Interjections.

Hon. Mr. Smitherman: Oh, now they don't like it. They can bring the hard question, but they can't even bear to address the fundamental accountability that was, for eight and a half years, their reputation and record.

Acute care beds --

Interjection.

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): The member for Waterloo-Wellington needs to come to order.

The Minister of Health.

Hon. Mr. Smitherman: To address the circumstances on point: We had a situation in Ontario where acute care beds were cut by 22%. This is a capacity challenge. We're in the midst of a very significant rebuild. The Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal can speak to that. Markham-Stouffville is a community where a new hospital is coming. In fact, the 905 part of the GTA will see 45% of all the new bed construction that's ongoing.

We've worked very hard to support hospice and provide the necessary support for people --

The Speaker: Thank you. Supplementary.

Mr. Tory: The woman in question, Ms. Caligiuri, has been there since Sunday night. She's got multiple myeloma. Parts of her body are shutting down. She's on a morphine drip. They can't get her on chemotherapy because they can't get her a bed, which is a problem we hear about over and over again. When I asked you how it's come to this, the best you can tell me after you've been in government for more than three years now -- you've had three different reports on emergency rooms, you've been collecting the health tax, which is a tax you promised you wouldn't bring in, for more than three years, had all that money, and all you can do is blame some previous government.

What are you prepared to do for Ms. Caligiuri and for her family? What are you prepared to do for this woman, who is lying on a stretcher -- not even a bed -- in the emergency room of the Markham Stouffville Hospital, other than get up and make this kind of statement? What are you prepared to do? You are the Minister of Health. What are you prepared to do for her and her family specifically?

Hon. Mr. Smitherman: What I'm not prepared to do, for the point of the honourable member's excitement, is to bring an individual case like this forward. It dictates that people who are involved in making hundreds of thousands of clinical decisions every day make the very best ones that are possible in the circumstances. There are challenging circumstances like this -- nobody pretends about those -- and they have existed on the watch of all political parties.

On point, the honourable member asks about the premium. He proposes to cut it. If the circumstances are challenging now, when we've made a $2.5-billion investment annually in health care as a result of the greater contribution of the people of Ontario, which he proposes to cut, how will that improve circumstances?

We're building new bed capacity. We've enhanced our capacity to support. We're building new regional cancer centres. We're building beds back into the system. We're creating better community supports. We brought a home hospice and residential hospice program to provide support for people at the end of their life. The point is that we believe in public health care. We're working hard to rebuild it. We agree, there are challenges every single day and --

The Speaker: Thank you. New question.

ONTARIO ARTISTS

Ms. Cheri DiNovo (Parkdale-High Park): My question is for the Minister of Culture. We have in our gallery today some incredibly patient artists from ACTRA and the Writers' Union of Canada. We had Ms. Fiona Reid here a little earlier, but we've managed to drive her out with our bad acting.

Interjection.

Ms. DiNovo: Oh, is she here? There she is. Hello. We also have the American Federation of Musicians -- the Canadian office of that organization -- and the Brantford Musicians Association.

These artists are here for a reason. They've been waiting for your report on the status of the artist in Ontario, which was to have been completed within the first two years of your mandate -- and still no report. The report was to lay the foundation for status-of-the-artist legislation that would improve the living standards of tens of thousands of Ontario's artists. My question is very simple: Minister, when is this long-overdue report finally going to be released?

Hon. Caroline Di Cocco (Minister of Culture): I would like to welcome so many talented artists here today and also say how much we value their contributions to our cultural fabric and to the economy of Ontario. Today, we also had the High Park choir here singing, as well as a trio, which filled the halls in this place with music, a magnificent sound.

I'm pleased to convey to the member that this government has made some significant strides in creating a strong, healthy environment for arts and culture to thrive, and that in turn helps artists in Ontario. But we also have undertaken the largest consultation process of its kind, involving 4,000 individuals and associations.

My ministry and this government are committed to ameliorating the socio-economic conditions of artists, and we're working toward that end.

Ms. DiNovo: Meanwhile, her budget has been cut by about $88 million; meanwhile, status-of-the-artist legislation is still not in place; meanwhile, many who are artists in our province are classified as independent contractors and are not covered by the Employment Standards Act; meanwhile, child performers are not protected; meanwhile, income averaging is not in place. She promised on May 15 of last year that it would come in momentarily -- it's in Hansard, Madam Minister. So my question again is, when will you bring in the report, when will you bring in status-of-the-artist legislation?

Hon. Ms. Di Cocco: We have a very strong record of support for artists in this province. I'm going to state again that this ministry and this government value artists and are committed to ameliorating the socio-economic conditions of artists. I want to assure artists in this province that we're working toward that and making progress on that.

I know that this member is new to the Legislature, and I just want to provide one bit of information that I think is important for her to know: On June 24, 1991, the Minister of Culture of the day, Mr. Marchese, said, "I'm committed to working with the arts community and my colleagues in other ministries to develop a strong and effective status-of-the-artist policy in Ontario." In five years, they made absolutely no progress, but we're making progress on the --

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Thank you. New question.

BROWNFIELD SITES

Mr. Jim Brownell (Stormont-Dundas-Charlottenburgh): My question is to the Minister of Economic Development and Trade. On November 9 last year, I had the sad responsibility of announcing the closure of Domtar Fine Papers. This closure signalled the end of the era of big manufacturing as a principal source of employment in Cornwall. Since then, the community has shown its resilience and, with the support of this government, has begun its renaissance.

A big part of that renaissance was the announcement recently of the sale of the Domtar property to a local consortium. The announcement of the sale to a local buyer is truly good news, as it means there is interest in developing the former Domtar lands with the needs of the community in mind. I know that local municipal economic development officers will be working hard with the new owners of the Domtar property to attract new investment and promote the Domtar lands as some of the most desirable real estate in eastern Ontario.

Minister, what is your ministry doing to assist economic development teams at the local and municipal levels?

Hon. Sandra Pupatello (Minister of Economic Development and Trade, minister responsible for women's issues): Thank you very much for this question. It's important to note that the provincial government is prepared to go where help is needed, and the area of Cornwall is a very good example of this. The officials at MEDT, the economic development ministry, literally rushed in to see what they could do in preparing for the future of Cornwall and worked diligently with the economic development officers there. We've also hired new staff for this area to work with local officials to develop, and what recently came out of that is a report that has unveiled 35 areas now ready for investment in terms of manufacturing sites. This is the kind of collaboration that's required so that all of our regions across Ontario can be investment-ready. We're very pleased to say that we have three offices in the eastern Ontario area with six business officials on the ground, working with every potential opportunity. May I say as well that the local officials whom we've been glad to work with have done a tremendous job in making this area ready for investment.

Mr. Brownell: One of the biggest challenges in making this transition from our traditional heavy manufacturing base is in rejuvenating brownfield sites. Beyond the Domtar lands, there are many opportunities for converting industrial lands into vibrant mixed-use development. Just this August, the Minister of Labour had the opportunity to witness the redevelopment at the historic Cotton Mills on Cornwall's waterfront. The city of Cornwall, Chuck Charlebois of Groupe Renaissance and the Kaneb family of Cornwall Warehousing are to be congratulated for their hard work and vision on the Cotton Mills lands. However, municipalities and community groups like Renaissance face difficulty financing major brownfield projects.

Minister, what sort of incentives does the province offer to municipalities and developers to take on brownfield development?

1540

Hon. Ms. Pupatello: I'll refer it to the Minister of Finance.

Hon. Greg Sorbara (Minister of Finance, Chair of the Management Board of Cabinet): There is a little bit of what I describe as the Cornwall miracle going on in eastern Ontario, an area where we've seen some job loss, but also some real revitalization in the economy. One of the reasons we are moving forward on strengthening entities that want to create new jobs on brownfield sites is because of the way in which it inspires a new generation of economic growth in places like my friend describes.

Right now we have very specific tax incentives for entities that are willing to develop on brownfield sites. I know that my friend from Stormont-Dundas-Charlottenburgh is working directly with the communities, and I expect to see some really interesting new developments as a result of his work. Thank you, sir.

CONSIDERATION OF BILL 107

Mrs. Christine Elliott (Whitby-Ajax): My question is for the Premier. During the last election campaign you talked about cynicism among the electorate with respect to Ontario politics. You explicitly promised, and I quote, "Your MPP should be free to represent your views, not just parrot the views of his or her party. We will make sure all non-cabinet MPPs are free to criticize and vote against government legislation." Premier, Bill 107, your proposed destruction of Ontario's human rights public complaints and investigation system, is not yet law. According to the website of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, a transition team already has been hired and is working to design a new tribunal. What happened to your campaign promise? You're presuming that Bill 107 is going to pass, thereby making a sham of the committee process. How can you possibly expect your MPPs on this committee to vote without even considering the views of their constituents? And what do you have to say to the many racial --

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Thank you. Premier.

Hon. Dalton McGuinty (Premier, Minister of Research and Innovation): To the Attorney General.

Hon. Michael Bryant (Attorney General): I'm not quite sure what language is used on the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal's website. As you know, the tribunal is at arm's length from the Ministry of the Attorney General. Certainly nobody in this House -- and neither the tribunal nor the commission in any way, shape or form -- presumes to know what this Legislature will do in any matter. If you're suggesting that the tribunal is engaging in that activity, that's not my experience at all. In fact, I think what the tribunal is trying to do is look at the various options that may be ahead for the system in the event that Bill 107 moves forward. Certainly nobody presumes to question in any way, shape or form the wisdom of this Legislature as it continues to look very closely at Bill 107.

The Speaker: Supplementary.

Mrs. Elliott: My question again is for the Premier. Your campaign promise was, and I quote, "We will make our institutions more democratic by freeing your MPP to represent you," and "We will give more independence and power to legislative committees."

Premier, as you know, the justice policy committee is going to be voting tomorrow on a proposal to extend the hearings on Bill 107 until the hundreds of concerned organizations and groups have had the opportunity to make their presentations before the committee.

Given the precedent that was established during the summer committee hearings, that everyone who wishes to make a presentation before the committee can do so, are you going to allow your Liberal MPPs on this committee to vote freely on open and democratic hearings and to follow the established precedent, or are they going to have to act like trained seals and shut off the hearings?

Hon. Mr. Bryant: Obviously, the committee will have a number of matters that it's going to be considering this week. It's in the hands of a very good committee. I note that the reason there is significant interest in this bill is that we have not had the opportunity to provide and update the human rights system in more than 40 years.

When the Conservative Party was in government, there was absolutely zero interest in reforming the human rights system. They cut funding to the human rights system, they showed nothing but disdain towards the issues faced by the human rights system and they made no effort to reform the human rights system. So it is good to see the Conservative Party's new-found interest in human rights reform.

I look forward to the matter being debated in the committee, not only tomorrow and the next day but however long it takes. As the member knows, that's in the hands of the House leaders and that's in the hands of the committee, where it should be.

SAULT AREA HOSPITAL

Mr. Howard Hampton (Kenora-Rainy River): My question is for the Premier. When the McGuinty government approved the plan for a new Sault Ste. Marie area hospital in April 2005, you told people in Sault Ste. Marie that construction would start in early 2006, and you said the hospital would open in late 2008. Then you said construction would start in spring of 2007 with an opening in 2009. Now the chair of the Sault Ste. Marie hospital planning committee says no hospital at least until 2010 because of "delays getting into the bidding process."

Premier, will you guarantee today that the construction of the Sault-area hospital will start in the spring of 2007 and will be completed on time in 2009, and on budget, like you promised?

Hon. Dalton McGuinty (Premier, Minister of Research and Innovation): The Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal.

Hon. David Caplan (Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal, Deputy Government House Leader): The leader of the third party was in the Soo and spitting out these kinds of lines. The vice-president of the Sault-area hospital called his remarks "trash and nonsense" and, in fact, they are. Construction of the new Sault Area Hospital is on schedule. It is anticipated to begin in the summer of 2007. The tendering process, including evaluation of the proposals, is scheduled to be completed in spring of 2007, on schedule. The completion date for the project will not be confirmed until the negotiations with the successful bidder have been concluded and a construction schedule has been submitted. This has been the fact since the very beginning. The member well knows this. In fact, this announcement and this process and this project have been so well greeted by the people of Sault Ste. Marie, who have been desperate for a new hospital --

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Thank you.

Mr. Hampton: I didn't hear a guarantee there, and I know why. Because construction delays are already a reality for your profit-driven private-finance hospital in North Bay, and the Belleville profit-driven private-finance hospital project deadlines have been pushed back three times. Even your member from Sault Ste. Marie told the Sault Ste. Marie Star, "No one knows exactly when the completion date is for the Sault Area Hospital."

I say to the Premier, what the people of Ontario want to know is, how much additional money and how much additional time will the McGuinty government's profit-driven private-finance hospital scheme cost our health care system?

Hon. Mr. Caplan: The public, not only the people of the Soo but the people of Ontario, will be price-protected. Unlike the NDP and their former member, Mr. Martin, who could not deliver a new hospital in Sault Ste. Marie, a new cancer centre in Sault Ste. Marie, David Orazietti, the member from Sault Ste. Marie, is delivering a new facility that will be 20% larger than the existing two hospitals, that will have an emergency room twice the current size. A 289-bed publicly owned hospital will house a radiation treatment satellite and provide closer-to-home access to life-saving care for more than 100,000 residents of Sault Ste. Marie. Speaker, I would want you to know that Algoma region residents too will share in this great news. In fact, once we have a project agreement finalized and signed, a copy will be posted on the Infrastructure Ontario website so that not only Sault Ste. Marie residents but all Ontarians will be able to --

The Speaker: Thank you, Minister.

ACCESSIBILITY FOR THE DISABLED

Mr. Khalil Ramal (London-Fanshawe): My question is for the Minister of Community and Social Services. Last year, the members of this House took a strong stand on accessibility when they voted for the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, which will make Ontario more accessible to people with disabilities by law. Could you, Minister, tell us what steps are being taken to implement this act?

Hon. Madeleine Meilleur (Minister of Community and Social Services, minister responsible for francophone affairs): Thank you very much for the question. We all know the devotion of the member from London-Fanshawe with regard to accessibility. As all honourable members of this House know, the act lays out the road map to make Ontario accessible to all people by 2025 -- and 2025 is not the beginning, it is the end.

1550

Under the act, new and mandatory accessibility standards are being developed which will bring down barriers that many people with disabilities face in their daily lives. In October 2005, we announced that the first two standards to be developed would cover the areas of transportation and customer service. I am pleased that the customer service standard development committee has agreed upon a proposed standard on accessible customer service. The standard has been posted for consultation with the public.

We have also begun accepting applications for membership on the third standard development committee. I invite everyone --

The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown): Thank you.

PETITIONS

DISABLED PERSONS
PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM

Mr. John O'Toole (Durham): It's a pleasure to present a petition on behalf of the constituents of the riding of Durham. It reads as follows:

"Whereas a disabled person parking permit can only be issued to qualified individuals who are unable to walk unassisted for more than 200 metres in eight minutes or less without causing serious difficulty or danger to safety or health; and

"Whereas the inability to walk unassisted as defined by the Ministry of Transportation is not always determined by a visible disability; and

"Whereas invisible disabilities can often result in difficultly or danger to safety or health when walking; and

"Whereas fines and revoked privileges resulting from misuse of disabled person parking permits are not always enforced;

"Therefore we, the undersigned, petition the Legislature of Ontario to further extend the disabled person parking permit program to include invisible disabilities, and ensure that enforcement is emphasized and carried out to a greater degree."

I'm pleased to present this to Philip, and to sign it and endorse it on behalf of my constituents in the riding of Durham.

TUITION

Ms. Andrea Horwath (Hamilton East): I have a petition here which is to stop tuition fee hikes and improve access and quality in post-secondary education. It's to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario from the University of Toronto Students' Administrative Council, and it reads:

"Whereas the Ontario Liberal government cancelled the tuition fee freeze after only two years and approved fee increases of up to 36% over the next four years; and

"Whereas tuition fees in Ontario have increased by more than four times the rate of inflation over the past 15 years; and

"Whereas a majority of Ontarians oppose tuition fee increases and support greater public funding for colleges and universities; and

"Whereas improvements to student financial assistance are undermined by fee increases; and

"Whereas the Ontario government's recent increase to student loan limits is set to push student debt to approximately $28,000 for a four-year program; and

"Whereas per-student investment in Ontario still lags significantly behind the vast majority of jurisdictions in North America;

"Therefore we, the undersigned, support the Canadian Federation of Students' call to stop tuition fee hikes and petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario to:

" -- reduce tuition fees to 2004 levels for all students in Ontario and implement an immediate tuition fee freeze;

" -- increase public funding for post-secondary education to promote access and quality;

" -- expand access to financial aid in Ontario, especially for part-time students; and

" -- double the number of upfront, need-based grants for Ontario students."

Mr. Speaker, I present this petition. I agree with it and send it down to the table by way of Colby.

COMMUNITY MEDIATION

Mr. Bob Delaney (Mississauga West): I have a petition to the Ontario Legislative Assembly in support of community mediation. I'd like to thank Syed Hasan and Gavin Riddel of Mississauga for collecting the signatures and sending it to me. It reads as follows:

"Whereas many types of civil disputes may be resolved through community mediation delivered by trained mediators, who are volunteers who work with the parties in the dispute; and

"Whereas Inter-Cultural Neighbourhood Social Services established the Peel Community Mediation Service in 1999 with support from the government of Ontario through the Trillium Foundation, the Rotary Club of Mississauga West and the United Way of Peel, and has proven the viability and success of community mediation; and

"Whereas the city of Mississauga and the town of Caledon have endorsed the Peel Community Mediation Service, and law enforcement bodies refer many cases to the Peel Community Mediation Service as an alternative to a court dispute; and

"Whereas court facilities and court time are both scarce and expensive, the cost of community mediation is very small and the extra expense incurred for lack of community mediation in in Peel region would be much greater than the small annual cost of funding community mediation;

"Be it therefore resolved that the government of Ontario, through the Ministry of the Attorney General, support and fund the ongoing service delivery of the Peel Community Mediation Service through Inter-Cultural Neighbourhood Social Services."

I'm pleased to support this petition and to ask page Kelsea to carry it for me.

MUNICIPAL PLANNING

Mr. Ted Chudleigh (Halton): "To the Legislative Assembly of Ontario:

"Whereas section 23 of the recently passed Planning and Conservation Land Statute Law Amendment Act, 2006, Bill 51, exempts energy projects from the municipal planning process; and

"Whereas we believe that it is essential to have more transparency and openness in the planning process, not less; and

"Whereas we believe that public consultation and municipal planning on the location of power plants is essential to ensure healthy sustainable communities;

"Therefore we, the undersigned, petition the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as follows:

"To amend section 23 of the Planning and Conservation Land Statute Law Amendment Act, 2006, to include a process for appeal."

I'm very pleased to sign this and give it to Philip, who is going to take it to the table.

TUITION

Ms. Andrea Horwath (Hamilton East): I have more petitions on tuition fee hikes. This is from the University of Toronto Students' Administrative Council, as well. A number of signatures are on this petition, and it reads: