No. 97

N^o 97

Votes and Proceedings

Procès-verbaux

Legislative Assembly
of Ontario

Assemblée législative
de l'Ontario

Monday
October 30, 2000

Daytime Meeting - Sessional Day 147
Evening Meeting - Sessional Day 148

Lundi
30 octobre 2000

Séance de l'après-midi - jour de session 147
Séance du soir - jour de session 148

1st Session,
37th Parliament

1^re session
37^e législature

Prayers
1:30 P.M.

Prières
13 H 30

Introduction of Bills

Dépôt des Projets de Loi

The following Bill was introduced, read the first time and referred to the Commissioners of Estate Bills:-

Le projet de loi suivant est présenté, lu une première fois et déféré aux commissaires aux
projets de loi ayant trait à une succession:-

Motions

Motions

On motion by Mr. Sterling,

Sur la motion de M. Sterling,

Ordered, That, pursuant to Standing Order 9(c)(i), the House shall meet from 6:45 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on Monday, October 30, Tuesday, October 31, and Wednesday, November 1, 2000, for the purpose of considering government business.

Petitions

Pétitions

Petitions relating to the Northern Health Travel Grant program / Programme de subventions accordées aux résidents du nord de l'Ontario (Sessional Paper No. P-1) Mr. Bartolucci, Mr. Brown, Mr. Gravelle, and Ms. Martel.

Petition relating to Vintage Automobiles (Sessional Paper No. P-152) Mr. O'Toole.

Petition relating to Hand-held cellular phones (Sessional Paper No. P-153) Mr. O'Toole.

Petition relating to Re-evaluating the use of Paper Sludge in Ontario (Sessional Paper No. P-159)
Mr. O'Toole.

Petition relating to Transfer of pension assets (Sessional Paper No. P-166) Mr. Hoy.

Orders of the Day

Ordre du Jour

Opposition Day

Jour de l'opposition

Mrs. McLeod moved,

M^me McLeod propose,

That this House recognizes that:

· The government of Ontario is perpetuating a policy of discrimination against residents of Northern Ontario who have to travel to receive cancer care;

· The government of Ontario has established a standard of ensuring that 100% of costs of travel for cancer patients referred from Southern Ontario are covered;

· The Canada Health Act and the Constitution of Canada require that any health program that is offered must be extended equally to everyone; and

That this House resolves that 100% of the costs of travel to receive cancer care must be covered, regardless of whether the cancer patient resides in Northern or Southern Ontario.

A debate arising, after some time, the motion was lost on the following division:-

Un débat s'ensuit et après quelque temps, la motion est rejetée par le vote suivant:-

AYES / POUR - 31

Agostino

Dombrowsky

McGuinty

Bartolucci

Duncan

McLeod

Bisson

Gravelle

McMeekin

Bountrogianni

Hampton

Parsons

Boyer

Hoy

Peters

Bradley

Kennedy

Phillips

Bryant

Kormos

Ruprecht

Caplan

Lankin

Sergio

Christopherson

Levac

Smitherman

Conway

Marchese

Crozier

Martel

NAYS / CONTRE - 47

Arnott

Hudak

Palladini

Baird

Jackson

Runciman

Chudleigh

Johns

Sampson

Clark

Johnson

Spina

Clement

Kells

Sterling

Coburn

Klees

Stewart

Cunningham

Marland

Stockwell

DeFaria

Maves

Tilson

Dunlop

Mazzilli

Tsubouchi

Ecker

Molinari

Turnbull

Elliott

Munro

Wettlaufer

Gilchrist

Murdoch

Wilson

Gill

Mushinski

Witmer

Guzzo

Newman

Wood

Hastings

O'Toole

Young

Hodgson

Ouellette

The House then adjourned at 6:00 p.m.

À 18 h, la chambre a ensuite ajourné ses travaux.

6:45 P.M.

18 H 45

Orders of the Day

Ordre du Jour

Debate was resumed on the motion for Second Reading of Bill 132, An Act to enact the Post-secondary Education Choice and Excellence Act, 2000, repeal the Degree Granting Act and change the title of and make amendments to the Ministry of Colleges and Universities Act.

Le débat reprend sur la motion portant deuxième lecture du projet de loi 132, Loi édictant la Loi de 2000 favorisant le choix et l'excellence au niveau postsecondaire, abrogeant la Loi sur l'attribution de grades universitaires et modifiant le titre et le texte de la Loi sur le ministère des Collèges et Universités.

After some time, pursuant to Standing Order 9(a), the motion for the adjournment of the debate was deemed to have been made and carried.

Après quelque temps, conformément à l'article 9(a) du Règlement, la motion d'ajournement du débat est réputée avoir été proposée et adoptée.

The House then adjourned at 9:30 p.m.

À 21 h 30, la chambre a ensuite ajourné ses travaux.

le président

GARY CARR

Speaker

Sessional Papers Presented Pursuant to Standing Order 39(A):-

Documents Parlementaires Déposés Conformément à l'Article 39(A) du Règlement

Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario / Institut de recherche agricole de l'Ontario, Annual Report 1999-2000 (No. 199).

Canola, Fund for Producers of, Financial Statement for the year ended March 31, 2000 (No. 201).

Grain Corn and Soybeans, Fund for Producers of, Financial Statement for the year ended March 31, 2000 (No. 200).

Ontario Securities Commission / Commission des valeurs mobilières de l'Ontario, Annual Report 2000 (No. 198).

Part-time appointments re intended Order-in-Council dated October 25, 2000 (No. 197) (Tabled
October 27, 2000).

Responses to Petitions

Réponses aux Pétitions

Petition relating to Continuation of the Late Start Program (Sessional Paper No. P-114):

(Tabled June 6, 14, 19, 2000) Mr. Hoy.