Daytime Meeting - Sessional Day 176
Evening Meeting - Sessional Day 177
Lundi
4 avril 2005
Séance de l'après-midi - jour de session 176
Séance du soir - jour de session 177
1st Session,
38th Parliament
1re session
38e législature
PRAYERS
1:30 P.M.
PRIÈRES
13 H 30
MOTIONS
MOTIONS
Mr. Duncan moved,
M. Duncan propose,
That pursuant to Standing Order
9(c)(i), the House shall meet from 6:45 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on
Monday, April 4, 2005, for the purpose of considering government
business.
The question being put on the
motion, it was carried on the following division:-
La motion, mise aux voix, est
adoptée par le vote suivant:-
AYES / POUR -
70
Arnott
Arthurs
Baird
Bartolucci
Bentley
Berardinetti
Bradley
Broten
Brownell
Bryant
Cansfield
Caplan
Chambers
Cordiano
Delaney
Dhillon
Di Cocco
Dombrowsky
Duguid
Duncan
Dunlop
Flaherty
Flynn
Fonseca
Gerretsen
Gravelle
Hardeman
Hoy
Jackson
Jeffrey
Kennedy
Klees
Kwinter
Lalonde
Leal
Levac
Marsales
Matthews
Mauro
McMeekin
McNeely
Meilleur
Miller
Mitchell
Mossop
Munro
Orazietti
O'Toole
Ouellette
Parsons
Peters
Phillips
Racco
Ramal
Rinaldi
Runciman
Ruprecht
Sergio
Smith
Sterling
Takhar
Tory
Van Bommel
Watson
Wilkinson
Witmer
Wong
Wynne
Yakabuski
Zimmer
NAYS / CONTRE -
6
Bisson
Horwath
Kormos
Marchese
Martel
Prue
Following remarks by Mr.
McGuinty, Mr. Tory and Mr. Hampton, the House observed a moment
of silence in respect of the death of His Holiness Pope John Paul
II.
The Speaker delivered the
following ruling:-
On Tuesday, March 29, 2005, the
Member for Simcoe North (Mr. Dunlop) rose on a question of
privilege concerning the circumstances surrounding a public
announcement by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional
Services (Mr. Kwinter) on March 22, 2005. According to the
Member, only government Members received advance notice of the
announcement, and the Ministry ignored or rebuffed Opposition
requests for information about the announcement, contrary to the
custom and tradition of the House.
I have had an opportunity to
review the Hansard for that day, together with our
precedents and the relevant parliamentary authorities.
Our precedents indicate that
although the Speaker has a duty to preserve Members' rights to
seek information under the Standing Orders, there are limits to
the Speaker's authority. For example, on October 9, 1997, at page
801 of the Journals of that day, Speaker Stockwell made
the following remarks concerning Ministry financial information
that was released to Opposition members only after it had been
released to government Members and the media:
... I appreciate that the member
would have preferred that all members could have received the
information at the same time. However, the Speaker cannot require
the government to release such information -- or to release it at
a certain time. There is nothing in our rules or our practice
that would permit the Speaker to control the dissemination of
that kind of information. It is clear from any number of previous
Speakers' rulings that these types of situations do not amount to
a prima facie case of privilege.
I agree with this view and find
therefore that a prima facie case of privilege has not
been established.
In closing, I thank the Member
for Simcoe North for raising his concern.
PETITIONS
PÉTITIONS
Petition relating to passing
Bill 3, An Act to protect anaphylactic students (Sessional Paper
No. P-180) Mr. Levac.
Petition relating to placing
restrictions on the eligibility of persons who act as volunteers
in schools (Sessional Paper No. P-183) Mr. Flaherty.
Petition relating to removing
the present minimum amount regarding non-refundable income tax
credit prescribed in the Income Tax Act (Sessional Paper No.
P-200) Mr. O'Toole.
Petition relating to stopping
public private partnership hospital deals and return to public
funding (Sessional Paper No. P-208) Mr. Leal.
Petition relating to consulting
with farmers to develop a long-term strategy to ensure the
viability of agriculture in Ontario (Sessional Paper No. P-243)
Mr. O'Toole.
Petition relating to Rural
Revolution's resolution concerning farm income (Sessional Paper
No. P-250) Mr. Hardeman.
Petition relating to keeping the
Rideau Regional Centre open (Sessional Paper No. P-258) Mr.
Sterling.
Petitions relating to creating
new landlord-tenant legislation (Sessional Paper No. P-263) Mr.
Bisson and Mr. Ruprecht.
ORDERS OF THE
DAY
ORDRE DU JOUR
A debate arose on the motion for
Second Reading of Bill 155, An Act to amend the Family
Responsibility and Support Arrears Enforcement Act, 1996 and to
make consequential amendments to the Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Act, 1997.
Il s'élève un
débat sur la motion portant deuxième lecture du projet
de loi 155, Loi modifiant la Loi de 1996 sur les obligations
familiales et l'exécution des arriérés d'aliments
et apportant des modifications corrélatives à la Loi de
1997 sur la protection du poisson et de la faune.
After some time, pursuant to
Standing Order 9, the motion for the adjournment of the debate
was deemed to have been made and carried.
Après quelque temps,
conformément à l'article 9 du Règlement, la motion
d'ajournement du débat est réputée avoir
été proposée et adoptée.
The House then adjourned at 6:00
p.m.
À 18 h, la chambre a
ensuite ajourné ses travaux.
6:45 P.M.
18 H 45
ORDERS OF THE
DAY
ORDRE DU JOUR
A debate arose on the motion for
Second Reading of Bill 92, An Act to amend the Municipal Act,
2001.
Il s'élève un
débat sur la motion portant deuxième lecture du projet
de loi 92, Loi modifiant la Loi de 2001 sur les
municipalités.
After some time, pursuant to
Standing Order 9, the motion for the adjournment of the debate
was deemed to have been made and carried.
Après quelque temps,
conformément à l'article 9 du Règlement, la motion
d'ajournement du débat est réputée avoir
été proposée et adoptée.
The House then adjourned at 9:30
p.m.
À 21 h 30, la chambre a
ensuite ajourné ses travaux.