Mr. Wong from the Standing
Committee on Regulations and Private Bills presented the
Committee's Report which was read as follows and
adopted:-
M. Wong du Comité permanent
des règlements et des projets de loi privés
présente le rapport du comité qui est lu comme suit et
adopté:-
Your Committee begs to report
the following Bill without amendment:-
Votre comité propose qu'il
soit permis de faire rapport sur le projet de loi suivant sans
amendement:-
Bill Pr3, An Act respecting the
Association of Registered Graphic Designers of
Ontario.
Your Committee begs to report
the following Bill as amended:-
Votre comité propose qu'il
soit permis de faire rapport sur le projet de loi suivant avec
des amendements:-
Bill Pr2, An Act respecting the
Malton Seventh-day Adventist Church.
INTRODUCTION OF
BILLS
DÉPÔT DES PROJETS
DE LOI
The following Bill was
introduced and read the first time:-
Le projet de loi suivant est
présenté et lu une première fois:-
Bill 81, An Act to amend the
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act with respect
to universities. Mr. Marchese.
Projet de loi 81, Loi modifiant
la Loi sur l'accès à l'information et la protection de
la vie privée en ce qui concerne les universités. M.
Marchese.
MOTIONS
MOTIONS
Mr. Duncan moved,
M. Duncan propose,
That pursuant to Standing Order
9(c)(i), the House shall meet from 6:45 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on
Wednesday, May 12, 2004 for the purpose of considering government
business.
The question being put on the
motion, it was carried on the following division:-
La motion, mise aux voix, est
adoptée par le vote suivant:-
AYES / POUR -
68
Baird
Barrett
Bartolucci
Bentley
Berardinetti
Bountrogianni
Bradley
Broten
Brown
Bryant
Cansfield
Chambers
Colle
Cordiano
Craitor
Crozier
Delaney
Dhillon
Di Cocco
Dombrowsky
Duguid
Duncan
Flynn
Fonseca
Gerretsen
Gravelle
Hardeman
Hoy
Jackson
Jeffrey
Kennedy
Klees
Lalonde
Levac
Marsales
Martiniuk
McNeely
Meilleur
Miller
Milloy
Mitchell
Mossop
O'Toole
Ouellette
Parsons
Patten
Peters
Phillips
Pupatello
Ramal
Ramsay
Rinaldi
Runciman
Ruprecht
Sandals
Scott
Sergio
Smith
Smitherman
Takhar
Van Bommel
Watson
Wilkinson
Wilson
Witmer
Wong
Wynne
Yakabuski
NAYS / CONTRE -
5
Churley
Kormos
Marchese
Martel
Prue
PETITIONS
PÉTITIONS
Petition relating to providing
of OHIP covered physiotherapy treatment to seniors and others
(Sessional Paper No. P-98) Ms. Martel.
Petition relating to resuming
negotiations between the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
and the Ontario Association of Optometrists and appointing a
mediator (Sessional Paper No. P-118) Mr. Levac.
Petitions relating to OHIP
coverage of chiropractic services (Sessional Paper No. P-119) Mr.
Klees and Mr. Ouellette.
ORDERS OF THE
DAY
ORDRE DU JOUR
Opposition Day
Jour de l'opposition
Mrs. Witmer moved,
Mme Witmer
propose,
That the Legislative Assembly
call upon the government,
To recognize that as of April 1,
2004, nursing homes in Ontario were to have received their annual
"case mix increase" adjustment of 1.4% in their base funding
allocations to cover increased labour costs and to keep up with
the increasing needs of residents,
To recognize that the McGuinty
government is clawing back property tax reimbursements to
specific Long-Term Care facilities, thereby placing additional
funding pressures on our nursing homes,
To recognize that the system has
been expanded by 20,000 beds and the last of those beds are now
being opened, and that new money is needed to fund these
beds,
And to recognize that Premier
McGuinty made a specific campaign promise to, "invest in better
nursing home care, providing an additional $6,000 in care for
every resident",
That Premier McGuinty live up to
his campaign promises and immediately increase long-term care
funding and stop the clawback of property tax
reimbursements.
A debate arising, after some
time, the motion was lost on the following division:-
Un débat s'ensuit et
après quelque temps, la motion est rejetée par le vote
suivant:-
AYES / POUR -
20
Baird
Barrett
Bisson
Eves
Hampton
Hardeman
Hudak
Jackson
Klees
Kormos
Martel
Martiniuk
Miller
Ouellette
Prue
Runciman
Scott
Wilson
Witmer
Yakabuski
NAYS / CONTRE -
49
Arthurs
Bartolucci
Berardinetti
Bountrogianni
Bradley
Broten
Brown
Bryant
Cansfield
Cordiano
Craitor
Delaney
Dhillon
Dombrowsky
Duguid
Duncan
Flynn
Gerretsen
Gravelle
Hoy
Jeffrey
Kennedy
Kwinter
Lalonde
Levac
Marsales
Mauro
McMeekin
Meilleur
Milloy
Mitchell
Mossop
Patten
Peters
Peterson
Phillips
Pupatello
Qaadri
Ramal
Ramsay
Ruprecht
Sandals
Sergio
Smith
Van Bommel
Watson
Wong
Wynne
Zimmer
With unanimous consent, the
following was agreed to:
That the House will continue to
meet past 6:00 p.m. to consider Bill 26, An Act to amend the
Planning Act, that one hour will be allotted to this debate,
divided equally among the Government, the Official Opposition,
and the Third Party; and that any required division will be
deemed to be deferred.
Debate was resumed on the motion
for Second Reading of Bill 26, An Act to amend the Planning
Act.
Le débat reprend sur la
motion portant deuxième lecture du projet de loi 26, Loi
modifiant la Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire.
After some time, the question
having been put, the Deputy Speaker (Mr. Crozier) declared his
opinion that the Ayes had it, and a recorded vote having been
demanded,
Après quelque temps, la
motion mise aux voix, le vice-président, M. Crozier
déclare qu'à son avis les voix favorables l'emportent
et un vote par appel nominal a été
demandé.
With unanimous consent, the vote
on the motion for Second Reading of Bill 26 was deferred until
May 13, 2004.
Avec le consentement unanime, le
vote sur la motion portant deuxième lecture du projet de loi
26 est différé jusqu'au 13 mai 2004.
The House then adjourned at 7:05
p.m.
À 19 h 05, la chambre a
ensuite ajourné ses travaux.
le président
Alvin Curling
Speaker
PETITIONS TABLED PURSUANT TO
STANDING ORDER 38 (A)
Petition relating to not
eliminating or reducing the provincial drug benefits provided to
seniors (Sessional Paper No. P-54) Mrs. Jeffrey.
Petition relating to providing
better access to GO train service on the Milton Line for
residents of western Mississauga (Sessional Paper No. P-93) Mr.
Delaney.
RESPONSES TO
PETITIONS
RÉPONSES AUX
PÉTITIONS
Petition relating to eliminating
the $5.6 billion deficit left by the previous government
(Sessional Paper No. P-6):
(Tabled December 1, 2003) Mr.
Berardinetti.
(Tabled December 4, 2003) Mr.
Tascona.
(Tabled December 8, 2003) Mrs.
Munro.
Petition relating to working for
the taxpayers of the province of Ontario (Sessional Paper No.
P-17):
(Tabled December 8, 2003) Mr.
Yakabuski.
Petition relating to a landfill
at site 41 (Sessional Paper No. P-27):
(Tabled March 31, 2004) Mr.
Dunlop.
(Tabled April 5, 2004) Mr.
Dunlop.
(Tabled April 6, 2004) Mr.
Dunlop.
(Tabled April 8, 2004) Mr.
Dunlop.
(Tabled April 13, 2004) Mr.
Wilson.
(Tabled April 14, 2004) Mr.
Dunlop.
(Tabled April 15, 2004) Mr.
Dunlop.
Petition relating to dealing
with the projected 2003-2004 Ontario Government deficit
(Sessional Paper No. P-36):