No. 225 No 225
Votes and Proceedings |
Procès-verbaux |
Legislative Assembly of Ontario |
Assemblée législative de l'Ontario |
1st Session, 36th Parliament |
1re session, 36e législature |
Monday, September 8, 1997 |
Lundi 8 septembre 1997 |
PRAYERS 1:30 P.M. |
PRIÈRES 13 H 30 |
REPORTS BY COMMITTEES |
RAPPORTS DES COMITÉS |
Mr Tilson from the Standing Committee on General Government presented the Committee's report as follows and moved its adoption:- |
M. Tilson du Comité permanent des affaires gouvernementales présente le rapport du comité et propose l'adoption comme suit:- |
Your Committee begs to report the following Bill as amended:- |
Votre comité propose qu'il soit permis de faire rapport sur le projet de loi suivant avec des amendements |
Bill 96, An Act to Consolidate and Revise the Law with respect to Residential Tenancies. |
Projet de loi 96, Loi codifiant et révisant le droit de la location à usage d'habitation. |
The motion having been put, was carried on the following division:- |
La motion, mise aux voix, est adoptée par le vote suivant:- |
AYES / POUR - 45
Baird Gilchrist Sampson
Beaubien Hodgson Shea
Boushy Johns Sheehan
Brown Johnson Snobelen
(Scarborough West) (Don Mills) Sterling
Chudleigh Kells Stewart
Cunningham Klees Tilson
Danford Mushinski Tsubouchi
Doyle Newman Turnbull
Ecker O'Toole Villeneuve
Elliott Ouellette Wettlaufer
Flaherty Parker Wilson
Ford Pettit Witmer
Fox Preston Wood
Froese Ross (London South)
Galt Runciman Young
NAYS / CONTRE - 33
Agostino Cordiano Martel
Bartolucci Curling Martin
Bisson Duncan McLeod
Boyd Gerretsen Morin
Bradley Grandmaître North
Brown Gravelle Patten
(Algoma-Manitoulin) Hoy Phillips
Castrilli Kormos Pouliot
Christopherson Kwinter Silipo
NAYS / CONTRE - Continued
Churley Lankin Wildman
Cleary Laughren
Colle Marchese
Pursuant to the Order of the House of June 2, 1997, the Bill is Ordered for Third Reading. |
Conformément à l'ordre adopté par l'Assemblée le 2 juin 1997, le projet de loi est ordonné pour la troisième lecture. |
INTRODUCTION OF BILLS |
DÉPÔT DES PROJETS DE LOI |
The following Bill was introduced and read the first time:- Bill 156, An Act to amend certain statutes with respect to The Regional Municipality of Sudbury. Mr R. Bartolucci. |
Le projet de loi suivant est présenté et lu une première fois:- Projet de loi 156, Loi modifiant certaines lois en ce qui concerne la municipalité régionale de Sudbury. M. R. Bartolucci. |
MOTIONS |
MOTIONS |
Mr Johnson (Don Mills) moved, |
M. Johnson (Don Mills) propose, |
That, pursuant to Standing Order 9(c), the House shall meet from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 9, 1997 and Wednesday, September 10, 1997 for the purpose of considering government business.
The question having been put on the motion was carried on the following division:- |
La motion, mise aux voix, est adoptée par le vote suivant:- |
AYES / POUR - 51
Baird Hodgson Sampson
Beaubien Jackson Shea
Boushy Johns Sheehan
Brown Johnson Snobelen
(Scarborough West) (Don Mills) Sterling
Chudleigh Johnson Stewart
Cunningham (Perth) Tilson
Danford Kells Tsubouchi
Doyle Klees Turnbull
Ecker Maves Vankoughnet
Elliott Mushinski Villeneuve
Fisher Newman Wettlaufer
Flaherty O'Toole Wilson
AYES / POUR - Continued
Ford Ouellette Witmer
Fox Parker Wood
Froese Pettit (London South)
Galt Preston Young
Gilchrist Ross
Hastings Runciman
NAYS / CONTRE - 35
Agostino Curling McLeod
Bartolucci Gerretsen Morin
Bisson Grandmaître North
Boyd Gravelle Patten
Bradley Hampton Phillips
Brown Hoy Pouliot
(Algoma-Manitoulin) Kormos Sergio
Castrilli Kwinter Silipo
Christopherson Lankin Wildman
Churley Laughren Wood
Cleary Marchese (Cochrane North)
Colle Martel
Cordiano Martin
Mr Johnson (Don Mills) moved, |
M. Johnson (Don Mills) propose, |
That the following changes be made to the Standing Committees:
On the Standing Committee on Administration of Justice
Mr Ford
Mrs Ross
Mr Young
Mr Chiarelli
Mr Christopherson
be removed,
On the Standing Committee on Estimates
Mr Beaubien
Mr Sheehan
Mr Vankoughnet
Mr Brown (Algoma-Manitoulin)
Ms Lankin
be removed and that
Mrs Johns be substituted for Mr Kells
On the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs
Mr Barrett
Mr Carr
Mr Martiniuk
Mr Cordiano
Mr Martin
be removed,
On the Standing Committee on General Government
Mr DeFaria
Mr Doyle
Mr Stewart
Mr Gravelle
Mr Wood (Cochrane North)
be removed,
On the Standing Committee on Government Agencies
Mr Ford
Mr Preston
Mr Tascona
Mr Bartolucci
Mr Kormos
be removed, and that
Mr Newman be substituted for Mrs Elliot,
and Mr Spina be substituted for Mr Guzzo
On the Standing Committee on the Legislative Assembly
Mr Baird
Mr Johnson (Brantford)
Mrs Pupatello
Mr Wildman
be removed, and that
Mr DeFaria be substituted for Mrs Marland,
and Mrs Ross be substituted for Mr McLean
and that
Mr North be added to the membership of the Standing Committee on the Legislative Assembly
On the Standing Committee on the Ombudsman
Mr Johnson (Brantford)
Mr Murdoch
Mr Ouellette
Mr Lalonde
Mr Marchese
be removed and that
Mr Ford be substituted for Mr Leadston,
and Mr Vankoughnet be substituted for Mr Boushy,
and Mr Agostino be substituted for Mr Crozier,
and Mrs Pupatello be substituted for Mr Hoy
On the Standing Committee on Public Accounts
Mrs Johns
Mr Murdoch
Mr Skarica
Mrs Pupatello
Mr Pouliot
be removed, and that
Mr Beaubien be substituted for Mr Shea
On the Standing Committee on Regulations and Private Bills
Mr Clement
Mr DeFaria
Mr Vankoughnet
Mr Kennedy
Mr Bisson
be removed, and that
Mr Leadston be substituted for Mrs Johns,
and Mr Brown (Algoma-Manitoulin) be substituted for Mr Gerretsen
On the Standing Committee on Resources Development
Mr Jordan
Mr O'Toole
Mr Spina
Mr Agostino
Ms Churley
be removed,
On the Standing Committee on Social Development
Mr Leadston
Mrs Munro
Mr Newman
Mr Patten
Mr Wildman
be removed, and that
Mr O'Toole be substituted for Mr Parker
On a point of order raised by the member for Beaches-Woodbine (Ms Lankin), the Speaker recessed the House for 10 minutes.
On his return, the Speaker delivered the following ruling:-
We are faced with a situation that is fairly unique. I must decide whether or not what we are dealing with today is a Routine Motion. The Standing Orders say that a motion that "changes committee membership" is a Routine Motion. Our practice has clearly been that routine motions of this nature have been simple substitution motions. In my view the motion before us seeks to do more than this, it is a motion that changes the number of members and adds the participation of an Independent member. I find therefore that this motion does not fit within the definition of Routine and will require notice.
ORDERS OF THE DAY |
ORDRE DU JOUR |
Mr Johnson (Don Mills) moved, |
M. Johnson (Don Mills) propose, |
That, pursuant to Standing Order 46 and notwithstanding any other Standing Order or Special Order of the House relating to Bill 148, An Act to deal with matters relating to the establishment of the new City of Toronto, when Bill 148 is next called as a government order, the Speaker shall put every question necessary to dispose of the second reading stage of the bill without further debate or amendment, and at such time the bill shall be referred to the Standing Committee on General Government;
That, the Standing Committee on General Government shall be authorized to meet for the purpose of conducting public hearings on the bill at its regularly scheduled meeting times on September 18th and September 25th;
That all amendments shall be tabled with the Clerk of the Committee by 12:00 noon on October 1st;
That the committee shall be authorized to meet to consider the bill for clause-by-clause consideration during its regularly scheduled meeting times on October 2nd; and that the Committee shall be authorized to meet beyond its normal hour of adjournment on October 2nd until completion of clause-by-clause consideration;
At 5:00 p.m. on October 2nd, those amendments which have not yet been moved shall be deemed to have been moved, and the Chair of the Committee shall interrupt the proceedings and shall, without further debate or amendment, put every question necessary to dispose of all remaining sections of the bill and any amendments thereto. Any divisions required shall be deferred until all remaining questions have been put and taken in succession with one 20-minute waiting period allowed pursuant to standing order 127(a);
That, the Committee shall report the bill to the House on October 6th. In the event that the Committee fails to report the bill on the date provided, the bill shall be deemed to be passed by the Committee and shall be deemed to be reported to and received by the House;
That, upon receiving the report of the Standing Committee on General Government, the Speaker shall put the question for adoption of the report forthwith, and at such time the bill shall be ordered for third reading;
That, one sessional day shall be allotted to the third reading stage of the bill. At 5:45 p.m. or 9:15 p.m. as the case may be on such day, the Speaker shall interrupt the proceedings and shall put every question necessary to dispose of this stage of the bill without further debate or amendment;
That, in the case of any division relating to any proceedings on the bill, the division bell shall be limited to 5 minutes.
A debate arose and, after some time, the motion was carried on the following division:- |
Il s'élève un débat et après quelque temps, la motion est adoptée par le vote suivant:- |
AYES / POUR - 46
Baird Gilchrist Ouellette
Beaubien Grimmett Parker
Boushy Hardeman Preston
Chudleigh Hastings Ross
Clement Hodgson Sampson
Cunningham Jackson Shea
Danford Johns Sheehan
DeFaria Johnson Sterling
Doyle (Don Mills) Stewart
Elliott Jordan Turnbull
Fisher Klees Vankoughnet
Flaherty Leadston Villeneuve
Ford Munro Wettlaufer
Fox Mushinski Wood
Froese Newman (London South)
Galt O'Toole Young
NAYS / CONTRE - 17
Bisson Gerretsen Martin
Bradley Gravelle McLeod
Castrilli Hoy Patten
Christopherson Kormos Pouliot
Churley Marchese Silipo
Cleary Martel
The House then adjourned at 6:00 p.m. |
À 18 h, la chambre a ensuite ajourné ses travaux. |
le président
Christopher M. Stockwell
Speaker
Sessional Papers Presented Pursuant to Standing Order 39(a):- |
Documents Parlementaires Déposés Conformément à l'article 39(a) du Règlement:- |
Ontario New Home Warranty Program, Annual Report 1996 (No. 562) (Tabled September 8, 1997).
Part-time appointments re intended Order-in-Council dated September 3, 1997 (No. 561) (Tabled September 5, 1997).
Workers' Compensation Board of Ontario / Commission des Accidents du Travail de l'Ontario, Annual Report 1996 (No. 560) (Tabled September 4, 1997).
Questions Answered (see Sessional Paper No. 5):-
Final Answers to Question Numbers: 1975 to 1978, 1982 and 1983.
Interim Answers to Question Numbers: 2080 and 2081.
Responses to Petitions:- |
Réponses aux Pétitions:- |
Petitions relating to Establishing a Dialysis treatment facility in Cornwall (Sessional Paper No. P-266):
(Tabled August 18, 19, 1997) Mr J. Cleary.
Petitions relating to a Variance allowing only standby chlorination to be used in Milton's water delivery system (Sessional Paper No. P-269):
(Tabled August 19, 26, 1997) Mr T. Chudleigh.
Petitions relating to Support for all current forms of black bear hunting (Sessional Paper No. P-275):
(Tabled August 25, 1997) Mr R. Bartolucci.
(Tabled August 21, 25, 1997) Mr J. O'Toole.
Petitions relating to Public consultation with Ontarians on the future of TVO/TFO (Sessional Paper No. P-291):
(Tabled August 18; September 2, 1997) Mr M. Gravelle.
Petition relating to Proposal to change the structure of relations between the provinces and municipalities without public consultation (Sessional Paper No. P-303):
(Tabled September 2, 1997) Mr J. Cleary.