CONTENTS
Wednesday 21 October 1992
Subcommittee report
STANDING COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
Chair / Président: Runciman, Robert W. (Leeds-Grenville PC)
*Vice-Chair / Vice-Président: McLean, Allan K. (Simcoe East/-Est PC)
Bradley, James J. (St Catharines L)
*Carter, Jenny (Peterborough ND)
Cleary, John C. (Cornwall L)
Ferguson, Will, (Kitchener ND)
*Frankford, Robert (Scarborough East/-Est ND)
*Grandmaître, Bernard (Ottawa East/-Est L)
Marchese, Rosario (Fort York ND)
Stockwell, Chris (Etobicoke West/-Ouest PC)
*Waters, Daniel (Muskoka-Georgian Bay/Muskoka-Baie-Georgienne ND)
Wiseman, Jim (Durham West/-Ouest ND)
Substitutions / Membres remplaçants:
*Cooper, Mike (Kitchener-Wilmot ND) for Mr Ferguson
*Rizzo, Tony (Oakwood ND) for Mr Wiseman
*Tilson, David (Dufferin-Peel PC) for Mr Stockwell
*Wilson, Gary (Kingston and The Islands/Kingston et Iles ND) for Mr Marchese
*In attendance / présents
Clerk pro tem / Greffière par intérim: Mellor, Lynn
The committee met at 1009 in room 228.
SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
The Vice-Chair (Mr Allan McLean): I call the standing committee on government agencies to order. The first item on the agenda today will be the subcommittee's report of Wednesday the 14th. Is there any discussion with regard to the subcommittee's report?
Mr Daniel Waters (Muskoka-Georgian Bay): A bit of discussion, and that is that due to other circumstances and work, I got it at 4 o'clock yesterday. And no, I didn't watch all the ball game last night. I only got the last part of it. As most of us would like to review the documents and compare them with our previous notes, I was wondering if there is any way of taking today's agenda and moving it to the back of the subcommittee's report.
The Vice-Chair: There is some time, the clerk has brought to my attention. Wednesday the 4th are tentative proposals: The review of the municipal board hasn't been confirmed yet, so there may be a slot there, and the Metropolitan Toronto Police Services Board's proposed witnesses have not been confirmed yet.
Mr Waters: I have no problem doing it there, Mr Chair. The problem is that I just haven't had a chance from 4 o'clock yesterday to now to review my notes as well as read over all the documents.
Clerk pro tem (Ms Lynn Mellor): Maybe I could just bump everything down?
Mr Waters: Wherever the clerk can fit it in; I think we would all agree. If she can fit it in prior to that, the only thing I would want to make sure we didn't jeopardize was any review of an appointee. We do have that 30-day time line, so as long as we can work around that and rework the agenda for the next months, I think we'd all be supportive of that.
Clerk pro tem: On November 4 there will be two appointments to be reviewed there. You'll notice the time frame that was set was from 9:30 to 12:30. After we do the review of the appointments, we could do the review with David there, and then bump the OMB down to where the discussion is on November 18, just bump that discussion down, bump everything down? Leave the review of appointments on the same dates, but anything else, bump it down.
Mr Waters: I see no problem with that, Mr Chair.
The Vice-Chair: Then we'll accept the subcommittee report, as amended. All in favour of that? Opposed, if any? Carried.
Interjections.
The Vice-Chair: That's right. So that's got the subcommittee report. The wish is, then, for the committee's business for today?
Mr Waters: That it be postponed. I move adjournment of the committee for today.
The Vice-Chair: All in favour? Carried. Okay, we're back next week.
The committee adjourned at 1012.